Literature DB >> 12239573

Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water versus distilled water.

James D Kettering1, Joni A Stephens, Carlos A Muñoz-Viveros, W Patrick Naylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The maximum recommended level of microbial contamination of water from dental unit waterlines (DUWL) is 200 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). This article addresses the importance of water selection in achieving that standard.
METHODS: Microbial contamination in water samples from 75 new dental units, with a closed-circuit water system, were compared using combinations of tap water and sterile distilled water with and without two chemical disinfectants (bleach and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, Bio2000) over a six-week period. Baseline tap water samples were collected and tested initially.
RESULTS: The microbial plate counts of seven tap water specimens (controls) ranged from 4 to 95 CFU/mL. These results were well below both the 500 CFU/mL standard for public drinking water and the 200 CFU/mL goal for dental treatment water. However, when passed through dental units, no significant bacterial reduction was achieved for samples of tap water (Group 1), tap water treated with bleach (Group 2), or tap water treated with Bio2000 (Group 4). Only water samples from dental units using Bio2000 alone (Group 3) or a combination of sterile, distilled water with Bio2000 (Group 5) met or exceeded the 200 CFU/mL standard.
CONCLUSIONS: Using tap water alone or tap water with bleach did not improve water quality. However, the American Dental Association (ADA) standard for reduced microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines was met using Bio2000 and distilled water treated with Bio2000. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The ADA standard of 200 CFU/mL was achieved using a closed water system and distilled water treated with Bio2000. Using 100% Bio2000 is also effective, but more costly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12239573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract        ISSN: 1526-3711


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union.

Authors:  A J Schel; P D Marsh; D J Bradshaw; M Finney; M R Fulford; E Frandsen; E Østergaard; J M ten Cate; W R Moorer; A Mavridou; J J Kamma; G Mandilara; L Stösser; S Kneist; R Araujo; N Contreras; P Goroncy-Bermes; D O'Mullane; F Burke; P O'Reilly; G Hourigan; M O'Sullivan; R Holman; J T Walker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Dental unit wastewater, a current environmental problem: a sistematic review.

Authors:  M E Cataldi; S Al Rakayan; C Arcuri; R Condò
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

Review 3.  Outbreaks of healthcare-associated infections linked to water-containing hospital equipment: a literature review.

Authors:  Wing-Kee Yiek; Olga Coenen; Mayke Nillesen; Jakko van Ingen; Edmée Bowles; Alma Tostmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.

Authors:  Raha Habib Agahi; Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour; Mahsa Kalantari; Amin Ayatollah-Mosavi; Hossein Aghassi; Amir Hossein Gandjalikhan Nassab
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.