Literature DB >> 12239247

The effect of donor gender on graft survival.

Martin Zeier1, Bernd Döhler, Gerhard Opelz, Eberhard Ritz.   

Abstract

Differences in actuarial graft survival according to donor gender have been reported for renal allografts and for cardiac and hepatic allografts, but for the latter in small series with limited biostatistical power. Using the large database of the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS), this study is an evaluation of graft survival according to donor and recipient gender for renal (n = 124,911), cardiac (n = 25,432), and hepatic (n = 16,410) transplants. Confounders, such as calendar year, geographical area, race, donor and recipient age, HLA mismatch, cold ischemia time, and others, as well as interaction terms were taken into consideration. Death-censored actuarial renal allograft survival from female compared with male donors was less in female recipients and even more so in male recipients. The donor gender-associated risk ratio for graft loss was 1.15 in female recipients and 1.22 in male recipients. The age-gender interaction term was statistically significant, the gender effect being more pronounced for younger (16 to 45 yr) compared with older (>45 yr) donors. Serum creatinine concentrations 1 yr after transplantation were also higher for recipients with kidney grafts coming from female donors irrespective of recipient gender. For first cardiac transplants, graft survival was inferior when the donor was female and the recipient male, but no statistical difference according to donor gender was demonstrable in female recipients. For first hepatic transplants overall, no significant differences according to donor gender were noted. The proportion of recipients who had treatment for rejection crisis during the first year was higher for male recipients of kidneys from female donors compared with male donors. No difference according to donor gender was demonstrable in female recipients. For cardiac and hepatic grafts, no significant effect of donor gender on the proportion of patients treated for rejection episodes was noted. The data show that adverse effects of female donor gender for different organs is much less uniform than reported in the past. An important confounder is donor age. A gender effect on graft survival is also observed for cardiac allografts. Therefore, in addition to potential "nephron underdosing," further pathomechanisms must play a role, possibly differences in immunogenicity according to donor gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12239247     DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000030078.74889.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  58 in total

1.  Overcoming cross-gender differences and challenges in Le Fort-based, craniomaxillofacial transplantation with enhanced computer-assisted technology.

Authors:  Chad R Gordon; Edward W Swanson; Srinivas M Susarla; Devin Coon; Erin Rada; Mohammed Al Rakan; Gabriel F Santiago; Jaimie T Shores; Steven C Bonawitz; Elliot K Fishman; Ryan Murphy; Mehran Armand; Peter Liacouras; Gerald T Grant; Gerald Brandacher; Wei-Ping Andrew Lee
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Mortality, rehospitalization, and post-transplant complications in gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Anne Jalowiec; Kathleen L Grady; Connie White-Williams
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  Sex and Kidney Transplantation: Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man?

Authors:  Phyllis August; Manikkam Suthanthiran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  The influence of gender and sexual hormones on incidence and outcome of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Kummer; Gero von Gersdorff; Markus J Kemper; Jun Oh
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Comparison of transplantation of adipose tissue- and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the infarcted heart.

Authors:  Koen E A van der Bogt; Sonja Schrepfer; Jin Yu; Ahmad Y Sheikh; Grant Hoyt; Johannes A Govaert; Jeffrey B Velotta; Christopher H Contag; Robert C Robbins; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Donor-recipient sex mismatch in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jane C Tan; Jane P Kim; Glenn M Chertow; F Carl Grumet; Manisha Desai
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2012-08-18

7.  Donor Factors Including Donor Risk Index Predict Fibrosis Progression, Allograft Loss, and Patient Survival following Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C Virus.

Authors:  Arun Jesudian; Sameer Desale; Jonathan Julia; Elizabeth Landry; Christopher Maxwell; Bhaskar Kallakury; Jacqueline Laurin; Kirti Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-12

8.  Tolerance induction or sensitization in mice exposed to noninherited maternal antigens (NIMA).

Authors:  M L Molitor-Dart; J Andrassy; L D Haynes; W J Burlingham
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Sex differences in response to cyclosporine immunosuppression in experimental kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Veronika Muller; Attila J Szabo; Aaron Erdely; You-Lin Tain; Chris Baylis
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 10.  [Current problems of kidney transplantation].

Authors:  H Haller; N Richter; V Bröcker; W Gwinner; F Gueler; A Schwarz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.