Literature DB >> 12239052

Physiologic subperiosteal new bone formation: prevalence, distribution, and thickness in neonates and infants.

David S Kwon1, Melissa R Spevak, Kenneth Fletcher, Paul K Kleinman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence, distribution, and thickness of physiologic subperiosteal new bone formation in neonates and infants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-detail postmortem skeletal radiologic surveys of 101 neonates and infants who had died from sudden infant death syndrome were reviewed. The average age at the time of death was 2.6 months (range, 2 weeks-8 months 2 weeks). The location, distribution, and thickness of subperiosteal new bone formation of the long bones were noted and measured with an ocular magnification system.
RESULTS: subperiosteal new bone formation was identified in 35 infants (35%), all of whom were between 1 and 4 months of age. The prevalence of subperiosteal new bone formation involving one or more bones was 37% for ages 1-2 months, 55% for ages 2-3 months, and 35% for ages 3-4 months. subperiosteal new bone formation involved the tibia in 29 infants (bilateral involvement in 19) and the femurs in 14 infants (bilateral involvement in 11). The humerus was a site of subperiosteal new bone formation in 12 infants; the ulna, in seven infants; and the radius, in two infants. The thickness of the subperiosteal new bone formation was never more than 1.8 mm, and the average thickness for the various long bones ranged from 0.7 to 0.9 mm.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that subperiosteal new bone formation is a common finding in infants 1-4 months of age. It is potentially an abnormal finding in neonates (CI = 0.0, 0.007) and in infants older than 4 months of age (CI = 0.0, 0.003). A thickness of 2 mm or more in subperiosteal new bone formation is likely to be abnormal and should prompt further diagnostic evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12239052     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Mandibular plasmocytoma with sun-ray periosteal reaction: A unique presentation.

Authors:  Afshin Mohammadi; Behrooz Ilkhanizadeh; Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Skeletal survey normal variants, artefacts and commonly misinterpreted findings not to be confused with non-accidental injury.

Authors:  Alan J Quigley; Samuel Stafrace
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-01-07

3.  A novel COL1A1 mutation in infantile cortical hyperostosis (Caffey disease) expands the spectrum of collagen-related disorders.

Authors:  Robert C Gensure; Outi Mäkitie; Catherine Barclay; Catherine Chan; Steven R Depalma; Murat Bastepe; Hilal Abuzahra; Richard Couper; Stefan Mundlos; David Sillence; Leena Ala Kokko; Jonathan G Seidman; William G Cole; Harald Jüppner
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  The nature and role of periosteum in bone and cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Seika Matsushima; Noritaka Isogai; Robin Jacquet; Elizabeth Lowder; Taku Tokui; William J Landis
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.481

5.  Idiopathic new bone formation in the femoral shafts of a cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  Jae-il Lee; Young-suk Kim; Myung-Jin Kim; Sung-Hyeok Hong
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 6.  The radiographic approach to child abuse.

Authors:  Jerry R Dwek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Biofabrication and Bone Tissue Regeneration: Cell Source, Approaches, and Challenges.

Authors:  Monia Orciani; Milena Fini; Roberto Di Primio; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.