Literature DB >> 12237625

Hysteroscopic transcervical endometrial resection versus thermal destruction for menorrhagia: a prospective randomized trial on satisfaction rate.

Massimiliano Pellicano1, Maurizio Guida, Giuseppe Acunzo, Domenico Cirillo, Giuseppe Bifulco, Carmine Nappi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the satisfaction rate and the effectiveness of transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection and thermal destruction of the endometrium in the treatment of menorrhagia. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial with 2 years of follow-up was carried out in the Department of Gynecology of the University of Naples. Eighty-two patients who were affected by menorrhagia that was unresponsive to medical treatment were respectively randomized to transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection or to thermal destruction of the endometrium. Satisfaction rate, operative time, discharge time, complication rate, reintervention rate, and resumption of normal activity were evaluated in each group.
RESULTS: The satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the thermal destruction group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the thermal destruction group (24 +/- 4 minutes vs 37 +/- 6 minutes). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the thermal destruction group (7.2 +/- 2.8 mL vs 89 +/- 38 mL). Reintervention rates were higher in the transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection group, although postoperative pain was not significantly different between the two groups. Discharge time, complication rate, and resumption of normal activity were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Thermal destruction of the endometrium for the treatment of menorrhagia should be considered an effective therapeutic option because of its acceptability among patients, shorter operative time, and lower blood loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12237625     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.124958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Sofia Dias; Vanessa Jordan; Anne Lethaby; Sarah F Lensen; Michelle R Wise; Jack Wilkinson; Julie Brown; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Comparison of Bipolar Ball Endometrial Ablation and Transcervical Resection of the Endometrium in the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Murali Subbaiah; Neethu Selvest; Dilip Kumar Maurya
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-08-03

Review 3.  Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients.

Authors:  L J Middleton; R Champaneria; J P Daniels; S Bhattacharya; K G Cooper; N H Hilken; P O'Donovan; M Gannon; R Gray; K S Khan; J Abbott; J Barrington; S Bhattacharya; M Y Bongers; J-L Brun; R Busfield; M Sowter; T J Clark; J Cooper; K G Cooper; S L Corson; K Dickersin; N Dwyer; M Gannon; J Hawe; R Hurskainen; W R Meyer; H O'Connor; S Pinion; A M Sambrook; W H Tam; I A A van Zon-Rabelink; E Zupi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-16

4.  Thermal balloon endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-09-01

Review 5.  Second generation endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding: network meta-analysis.

Authors:  J P Daniels; L J Middleton; R Champaneria; K S Khan; K Cooper; B W J Mol; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-23

6.  Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Mihaela Grigore; Julie Brown; Martha Hickey; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.