Literature DB >> 12235532

Prediction of VO(2peak) in wheelchair-dependent athletes from the adapted Léger and Boucher test.

A Vinet1, D Le Gallais, S Bouges, P-L Bernard, M Poulain, A Varray, J-P Micallef.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: :The purpose of this study was to provide a predictive peak oxygen uptake ([V]O(2) peak) equation in wheelchair-dependent athletes using the Adapted Léger and Boucher test. SUBJECTS AND PROTOCOL: :Fifty-six wheelchair-dependent athletes, 47 males and nine females (30.3+/-4 years), underwent a clinical examination to assess their anthropometric characteristics: height, mass, body mass index (BMI), lean body mass, arm length, and muscular arm volume. They performed a deceleration field test to assess the subject-wheelchair resistance defined as a mechanical variable, and they then performed the Adapted Léger and Boucher test to assess physiological data at maximal exercise ([V]O(2) peak, heart rate max) concomitantly with biomechanical (number of pushes) and performance variables (maximal aerobic velocity Va(max) and maximal distance). The [V]O(2) peak was measured directly using a portable telemetric oxygen analyzer. Subjects were then randomly assigned to an experimental group (n=49) to determine the predictive equation, and a validation group (n=7) to check the external validity of the equation.
RESULTS: A stepwise multiple regression with [V]O(2) peak (l min(-1)) as the dependent variable led to the following equation: [V]O(2) peak=0.22 Va(max) - 0.63 log(age)+0.05 BMI 0.25 level+0.52, with r(2)=0.81 and SEE=0.01. Paraplegic subjects with high and low lesion level spinal injuries were attributed the coefficient of 1 and 0, respectively. The external validity of the equation was positive since the predicted [V]O(2) peak values did not significantly differ from directly measured [V]O(2) peak (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: We concluded that [V]O(2) peak in wheelchair-dependent athletes was predictable using the equation of the present study and the described incremental test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12235532     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  5 in total

1.  Psychophysiological Stress Response of a Paralympic Athlete During an Ultra-Endurance Event. A Case Study.

Authors:  Pedro Belinchón-deMiguel; Pablo Ruisoto-Palomera; Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes.

Authors:  Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Christof A Leicht
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Predicting peak oxygen uptake from submaximal exercise after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Julia O Totosy de Zepetnek; Jason S Au; Adrienne T Hol; Janice J Eng; Maureen J MacDonald
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.665

4.  A new non exercise-based VO2max prediction equation for patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ivan Leonardo Duque; José-Hernán Parra; Alain Duvallet
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-07

5.  Body composition modifications in people with chronic spinal cord injury after supervised physical activity.

Authors:  Frederico Ribeiro Neto; Guilherme Henrique Lopes
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.