Literature DB >> 12235196

Vibrometric studies of the middle ear of the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana II. The operculum.

Matthew J Mason1, Peter M Narins.   

Abstract

The operculum and stapes footplate, the two moveable elements within the oval window of the frog, have been thought to function independently. In this study, laser interferometry was used to record the vibrations of both structures in response to free-field airborne sound. Contrary to expectation, the operculum appears to be coupled to the footplate. Coupling is achieved both by means of ligaments and by a cartilaginous flange of the footplate that underlies the operculum. The stapes footplate rotates about an axis located ventrolaterally, but the axis for the operculum is dorsomedial. As a result of this unusual morphology, the opercularis muscle, which connects the operculum and shoulder girdle, can potentially affect the movements of both the operculum and footplate. The proposed roles of the opercularis system in seismic signal detection and extratympanic sound transmission are critically reviewed in the light of this new evidence. An alternative or additional role for the opercularis system is proposed, involving the protection of the inner ear from high-amplitude displacements of the stapes footplate during breathing and vocalisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12235196     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.20.3167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Optical and tomographic imaging of a middle ear malformation in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  Seth S Horowitz; Andrea Megela Simmons; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus).

Authors:  Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Earless toads sense low frequencies but miss the high notes.

Authors:  Molly C Womack; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Luis A Coloma; Juan C Chaparro; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Authors:  Grace Capshaw; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.308

Review 6.  Mechanics of the exceptional anuran ear.

Authors:  Richard L M Schoffelen; Johannes M Segenhout; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Active control of ultrasonic hearing in frogs.

Authors:  Marcos Gridi-Papp; Albert S Feng; Jun-Xian Shen; Zu-Lin Yu; John J Rosowski; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Anthropogenic substrate-borne vibrations impact anuran calling.

Authors:  Valentina Caorsi; Vinicius Guerra; Raíssa Furtado; Diego Llusia; Lívia Roese Miron; Márcio Borges-Martins; Camila Both; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Rafael Márquez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The complex evolutionary history of the tympanic middle ear in frogs and toads (Anura).

Authors:  Martín O Pereyra; Molly C Womack; J Sebastián Barrionuevo; Boris L Blotto; Diego Baldo; Mariane Targino; Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria; Juan M Guayasamin; Luis A Coloma; Kim L Hoke; Taran Grant; Julián Faivovich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.