Literature DB >> 12234693

Characteristics of female smokers attending a lung cancer screening program: a pilot study with implications for program development.

Robert A Schnoll1, Suzanne M Miller, Michael Unger, Cecilia McAleer, Theresa Halbherr, Pamela Bradley.   

Abstract

Anticipating the development of lung cancer early detection programs, we examined the: (1) feasibility of a lung cancer early detection program; (2) characteristics of enrollees (e.g. motivation to quit smoking); (3) correlates of enrollee motivation to quit smoking; and (4) rates of smoking cessation following screening. Brief surveys were completed before and after screening, which involved sputum cytology, chest X-ray, bronchoscopy, spiral CT, and a meeting with an oncologist to discuss smoking cessation. Of the 168 eligible women who were heavy smokers recruited via newspaper and cancer center advertisements, 55 agreed to undergo screening. Enrollees showed low-to-moderate levels of quit motivation and high levels of nicotine addiction; enrollees were interested in a range of smoking cessation treatments; 20% of enrollees exhibited clinical-levels of emotional distress; 64% of enrollees reported low levels of self-efficacy (i.e. self-confidence) to quit; 24% of enrollees reported low levels of quitting pros and 25% reported high levels of quitting cons; 31% of enrollees showed high levels of fatalistic beliefs about cancer; and all enrollees recognized their elevated lung cancer risk. Greater motivation to quit smoking was related to: greater age, lower nicotine addiction, fewer health symptoms, and higher quitting self-efficacy and quitting pros. Finally, 16% of enrollees quit smoking after screening. Overall, many women eligible for screening refused to undergo comprehensive screening that included bronchoscopy and spiral CT. Screening may represent an opportunity for quitting smoking, although more intensive smoking cessation interventions that target nicotine addiction and self-efficacy may be needed to maximize the health benefits of an early detection program. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12234693     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(02)00106-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  10 in total

1.  A qualitative study of lung cancer risk perceptions and smoking beliefs among national lung screening trial participants.

Authors:  Elyse R Park; Joanna M Streck; Ilana F Gareen; Jamie S Ostroff; Kelly A Hyland; Nancy A Rigotti; Hannah Pajolek; Mark Nichter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Perceptions of lung cancer risk and beliefs in screening accuracy of spiral computed tomography among high-risk lung cancer family members.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Kari G Rabe; Tabetha A Brockman; Christi A Patten; Wesley O Petersen; Joshua Slusser; Ping Yang; Stephen J Swensen; Eric S Edell; Mariza de Andrade; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Joshua N Mirkin; Thomas K Oliver; Christopher G Azzoli; Donald A Berry; Otis W Brawley; Tim Byers; Graham A Colditz; Michael K Gould; James R Jett; Anita L Sabichi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Douglas E Wood; Amir Qaseem; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A pilot test of a combined tobacco dependence treatment and lung cancer screening program.

Authors:  Amy K Ferketich; Gregory A Otterson; Mark King; Nathan Hall; Kristine K Browning; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Susanne M Arnold; Celia L Love; Kenneth L Kirsh; Pamela G Moore; Steven D Passik
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Predictors of smoking cessation counseling adherence in a socioeconomically disadvantaged sample of pregnant women.

Authors:  Kuang-Yi Wen; Suzanne M Miller; Amy Lazev; Zhu Fang; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

7.  Examining whether lung screening changes risk perceptions: National Lung Screening Trial participants at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Elyse R Park; Ilana F Gareen; Amanda Jain; Jamie S Ostroff; Fenghai Duan; Jorean D Sicks; William Rakowski; Michael Diefenbach; Nancy A Rigotti
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose CT: Its Effect on Smoking Behavior.

Authors:  Meaghan McEntee Gomez; Geri LoBiondo-Wood
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2013-11

Review 9.  Pulmonary nodules and CT screening: the past, present and future.

Authors:  M Ruparel; S L Quaife; N Navani; J Wardle; S M Janes; D R Baldwin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 10.  Recommendations for Implementing Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Europe.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; David R Baldwin; Claudia I Henschke; Simone Ghislandi; Sergio Iavicoli; Matthijs Oudkerk; Harry J De Koning; Joseph Shemesh; John K Field; Javier J Zulueta; Denis Horgan; Lucia Fiestas Navarrete; Maurizio Valentino Infante; Pierluigi Novellis; Rachael L Murray; Nir Peled; Cristiano Rampinelli; Gaetano Rocco; Witold Rzyman; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Martin C Tammemagi; Luca Bertolaccini; Natthaya Triphuridet; Rowena Yip; Alexia Rossi; Suresh Senan; Giuseppe Ferrante; Kate Brain; Carlijn van der Aalst; Lorenzo Bonomo; Dario Consonni; Jan P Van Meerbeeck; Patrick Maisonneuve; Silvia Novello; Anand Devaraj; Zaigham Saghir; Giuseppe Pelosi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.