Literature DB >> 12234341

Comparative surface-to-hand and fingertip-to-mouth transfer efficiency of gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and phage.

P Rusin1, S Maxwell, C Gerba.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the transfer efficiency of micro-organisms from fomites to hands and the subsequent transfer from the fingertip to the lip. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Volunteers hands were sampled after the normal usage of fomites seeded with a pooled culture of a Gram-positive bacterium (Micrococcus luteus), a Gram-negative bacterium (Serratia rubidea) and phage PRD-1 (Period A). Activities included wringing out a dishcloth/sponge, turning on/off a kitchen faucet, cutting up a carrot, making hamburger patties, holding a phone receiver, and removing laundry from the washing machine. Transfer efficiencies were 38.47% to 65.80% and 27.59% to 40.03% for the phone receiver and faucet, respectively. Transfer efficiencies from porous fomites were <0.01%. In most cases, M.luteus was transferred most efficiently, followed by phage PRD-1 and S. rubidea. When the volunteers' fingertips were inoculated with the pooled organisms and held to the lip area (Period B), transfer rates of 40.99%, 33.97%, and 33.90% occurred with M. luteus, S. rubidea, and PRD-1, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The highest bacteral transfer rates from fomites to the hands were seen with the hard, non-porous surfaces. Even with low transfer rates, the numbers of bacteria transferred to the hands were still high (up to 10(6) cells). Transfer of bacteria from the fingertip to the lip is similar to that observed from hard surfaces to hands. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Infectious doses of pathogens may be transferred to the mouth after handling an everyday contaminated household object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12234341     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01734.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  91 in total

1.  Inoculum size influences bacterial cross contamination between surfaces.

Authors:  R Montville; D W Schaffner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Survival of Vibrio cholerae O1 on fomites.

Authors:  Israt Farhana; Zenat Zebin Hossain; Suhella Mohan Tulsiani; Peter Kjær Mackie Jensen; Anowara Begum
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Quantification of campylobacter species cross-contamination during handling of contaminated fresh chicken parts in kitchens.

Authors:  Petra Luber; Sigrid Brynestad; Daniela Topsch; Kathrin Scherer; Edda Bartelt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Significance of fomites in the spread of respiratory and enteric viral disease.

Authors:  Stephanie A Boone; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Enteric virus survival during household laundering and impact of disinfection with sodium hypochlorite.

Authors:  Charles P Gerba; Denise Kennedy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Transfer efficiency of bacteria and viruses from porous and nonporous fomites to fingers under different relative humidity conditions.

Authors:  Gerardo U Lopez; Charles P Gerba; Akrum H Tamimi; Masaaki Kitajima; Sheri L Maxwell; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of surface sampling methods for virus recovery from fomites.

Authors:  Timothy R Julian; Francisco J Tamayo; James O Leckie; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Use of a Hand Sanitizing Wipe for Reducing Risk of Viral Illness in the Home.

Authors:  Akrum H Tamimi; Sarah L Edmonds-Wilson; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites.

Authors:  Amanda B Herzog; Alok K Pandey; David Reyes-Gastelum; Charles P Gerba; Joan B Rose; Syed A Hashsham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  BSL-3 laboratory practices in the United States: comparison of select agent and non-select agent facilities.

Authors:  Stephanie L Richards; Victoria C Pompei; Alice Anderson
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.