Literature DB >> 12232649

[Efficient OP management. Suggestions for optimisation of organisation and administration as a basis for establishing statutes for operating theatres].

G Geldner1, L H J Eberhart, S Trunk, K G Dahmen, T Reissmann, T Weiler, A Bach.   

Abstract

Economic aspects have gained increasing importance in recent years. The operating room (OR) is the most cost-intensive sector and determines the turnover process of a surgical patient within the hospital. Thus, optimisation of workflow processes is of particular interest for health care providers. If the results of surgery are viewed as a product, everything associated with surgery can be evaluated analogously to a manufacturing process. All steps involved in producing the end-result can and should be analysed with the goal of producing an efficient, economical and quality product. The leadership that physicians can provide to manage this process is important and leads to the introduction of a specialised "OR manager". This position must have the authority to issue directives to all other members of the OR team. An OR management subordinates directly to the administration of the hospital. By integrating and improving management of various elements of the surgical process, health care institutions are able to rationally trim costs while maintaining high-quality services. This paper gives a short introduction into the difficulties of organising an OR. Some suggestions are made to overcome common shortcomings in the daily practise. A proposal for an "OR statute" is presented that should be a basis for discussion within the OR team. It must be modified according to individual needs and prerequisites in every hospital. The single best opportunity for dramatic improvement in effective resource use in surgical services lies in the perioperative process. The management strategy must focus on process measurement using information technology and feed-back implementing modern quality management tools.However, no short-term effects can be expected from these changes. Improvements take about a year and continuous feed-back of all measures must accompany the reorganisation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12232649     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-002-0362-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  12 in total

Review 1.  [The balanced scorecard. "Tool or toy" in hospitals].

Authors:  A Brinkmann; F Gebhard; R Isenmann; U Bothner; U Mohl; B Schwilk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Process optimization in ENT: clinical pathways and central induction area].

Authors:  O Göktas; F Fleiner; C Spies; H Krieg; K Bauer; B Sedlmaier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Workflow management in the operating room. Analysis of potentials for optimizing efficiency at a university hospital].

Authors:  A Welker; B Wolcke; A Schleppers; S B Schmeck; U Focke; H W Gervais; J Schmeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Operation room management in quality control certification of a mainstream hospital].

Authors:  W Leidinger; J N Meierhofer; G Schüpfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Operation room management: from degree of utilization to distribution of capacities. Cost reduction without decreasing productivity in the operation room using a new index].

Authors:  R Grote; S Perschmann; A Walleneit; B Sedlacek; D Leuchtmann; M Menzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Operating room management and operating room productivity: the case of Germany.

Authors:  Maresi Berry; Thomas Berry-Stölzle; Alexander Schleppers
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-09

Review 7.  [Importance of material logistics in the interface management of operation departments: is the supply of sterile equipment a new business area of operation room organization?].

Authors:  J Schmeck; S B Schmeck; W Kohnen; C Werner; M Schäfer; H Gervais
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  [Management for the operating room].

Authors:  O Tschudi; G Schüpfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Impact of thoracic epidural analgesia on revenue for G-DRG M01B, OPS-301 5-604.0 (radical retropubic prostatectomy)].

Authors:  A R Heller; R J Litz; D Wiessner; C Dammann; R Weissgerber; O W Hakenberg; M P Wirth; T Koch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  [Procedure optimization in hospital management].

Authors:  M Bauer; R Hanss; A Schleppers; M Steinfath; P H Tonner; J Martin
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.