Literature DB >> 12231941

Transport of Water and Solutes across Maize Roots Modified by Puncturing the Endodermis (Further Evidence for the Composite Transport Model of the Root).

E. Steudle1, M. Murrmann, C. A. Peterson.   

Abstract

The effects of puncturing the endodermis of young maize roots (Zea mays L.) on their transport properties were measured using the root pressure probe. Small holes with a diameter of 18 to 60 [mu]m were created 70 to 90 mm from the tips of the roots by pushing fine glass tubes radially into them. Such wounds injured about 10-2 to 10-3% of the total surface area of the endodermis, which, in these hydroponically grown roots, had developed a Casparian band but no suberin lamellae. The small injury to the endodermis caused the original root pressure, which varied from 0.08 to 0.19 MPa, to decrease rapidly (half-time = 10-100 s) and substantially to a new steady-state value between 0.02 and 0.07 MPa. The radial hydraulic conductivity (Lpr) of control (uninjured) roots determined using hydrostatic pressure gradients as driving forces was larger by a factor of 10 than that determined using osmotic gradients (averages: Lpr [hydrostatic] = 2.7 x 10-7 m s-1 MPa-1; Lpr [osmotic] = 2.2 x 10-8 m s-1 MPa-1; osmotic solute: NaCl). Puncturing the endodermis did not result in measurable increases in hydraulic conductivities measured by either method. Thus, the endodermis was not rate-limiting root Lpr: apparently the hydraulic resistance of roots was more evenly distributed over the entire root tissue. However, puncturing the endodermis did substantially change the reflection ([sigma]sr) and permeability (Psr) coefficients of roots for NaCl, indicating that the endodermis represented a considerable barrier to the flow of nutrient ions. Values of [sigma]sr decreased from 0.64 to 0.41 (average) and Psr increased by a factor of 2.6, i.e. from 3.8 x 10-9 to 10.1 x 10.-9 m s-1(average). The roots recovered from puncturing after a time and regained root pressure. Measurable increases in root pressure became apparent as soon as 0.5 to 1 h after puncturing, and original or higher root pressures were attained 1.5 to 20 h after injury. However, after recovery roots often did not maintain a stable root pressure, and no further osmotic experiments could be performed with them. The Casparian band of the endodermis is discontinuous at the root tip, where the endodermis has not yet matured, and at sites of developing lateral roots. Measurements of the cross-sectional area of the apoplasmic bypass at the root tip yielded an area of 0.031% of the total surface area of the endodermis. An additional 0.049% was associated with lateral root primordia. These areas are larger than the artificial bypasses created by wounding in this study and may provide pathways for a "natural bypass flow" of water and solutes across the intact root. If there were such a pathway, either in these areas or across the Casparian band itself, roots would have to be treated as a system composed of two parallel pathways (a cell-to-cell and an apoplasmic path). It is demonstrated that this "composite transport model of the root" allows integration of several transport properties of roots that are otherwise difficult to understand, namely (a) the differences between osmotic and hydrostatic water flow, (b) the dependence of root hydraulic resistance on the driving force or water flow across the root, and (c) low reflection coefficients of roots.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 12231941      PMCID: PMC158989          DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.2.335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  9 in total

1.  The Interaction between Osmotic- and Pressure-induced Water Flow in Plant Roots.

Authors:  E L Fiscus
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Water transport in maize roots : measurement of hydraulic conductivity, solute permeability, and of reflection coefficients of excised roots using the root pressure probe.

Authors:  E Steudle; R Oren; E D Schulze
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Quantifying Apoplastic Flux through Red Pine Root Systems Using Trisodium, 3-hydroxy-5,8,10-pyrenetrisulfonate.

Authors:  P J Hanson; E I Sucoff; A H Markhart
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Axial and Radial Hydraulic Resistance to Roots of Maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  J Frensch; E Steudle
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Effects of Salinity on Water Transport of Excised Maize (Zea mays L.) Roots.

Authors:  H Azaizeh; E Steudle
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Water transport properties of cortical cells in roots of nitrogen- and phosphorus-deficient cotton seedlings.

Authors:  J W Radin; M A Matthews
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Water Transport across Maize Roots : Simultaneous Measurement of Flows at the Cell and Root Level by Double Pressure Probe Technique.

Authors:  G L Zhu; E Steudle
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Diffusion and Electric Mobility of KCI within Isolated Cuticles of Citrus aurantium.

Authors:  M T Tyree; C R Wescott; C A Tabor; A D Morse
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Water Transport in Onion (Allium cepa L.) Roots (Changes of Axial and Radial Hydraulic Conductivities during Root Development).

Authors:  W. Melchior; E. Steudle
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.340

  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variations in woody plants.

Authors:  M Génard; S Fishman; G Vercambre; J G Huguet; C Bussi; J Besset; R Habib
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Apoplastic diffusion barriers in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Christiane Nawrath; Lukas Schreiber; Rochus Benni Franke; Niko Geldner; José J Reina-Pinto; Ljerka Kunst
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2013-12-27

3.  Water uptake along the length of grapevine fine roots: developmental anatomy, tissue-specific aquaporin expression, and pathways of water transport.

Authors:  Gregory A Gambetta; Jiong Fei; Thomas L Rost; Thorsten Knipfer; Mark A Matthews; Ken A Shackel; M Andrew Walker; Andrew J McElrone
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Apoplasmic and Protoplasmic Water Transport through the Parenchyma of the Potato Storage Organ.

Authors:  W. Michael; A. Schultz; A. B. Meshcheryakov; R. Ehwald
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Nitrate induction of root hydraulic conductivity in maize is not correlated with aquaporin expression.

Authors:  Anna Gorska; Anna Zwieniecka; N Michele Holbrook; Maciej A Zwieniecki
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  An expression analysis of a gene family encoding plasma membrane aquaporins in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ji Young Jang; Dong Gu Kim; Yeon Ok Kim; Jin Sun Kim; Hunseung Kang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Non-destructive estimation of root pressure using sap flow, stem diameter measurements and mechanistic modelling.

Authors:  Tom De Swaef; Jochen Hanssens; Annelies Cornelis; Kathy Steppe
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  GRANAR, a Computational Tool to Better Understand the Functional Importance of Monocotyledon Root Anatomy.

Authors:  Adrien Heymans; Valentin Couvreur; Therese LaRue; Ana Paez-Garcia; Guillaume Lobet
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Bicarbonate-induced alkalinization of the xylem sap in intact maize seedlings as measured in situ with a novel xylem pH probe.

Authors:  Lars H Wegner; Ulrich Zimmermann
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Roles of morphology, anatomy, and aquaporins in determining contrasting hydraulic behavior of roots.

Authors:  Helen Bramley; Neil C Turner; David W Turner; Stephen D Tyerman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.