Literature DB >> 12231547

Relation between Irofulven (MGI-114) systemic exposure and tumor response in human solid tumor xenografts.

Markos Leggas1, Clinton F Stewart, Michael H Woo, Maryam Fouladi, Pamela J Cheshire, Jennifer K Peterson, Henry S Friedman, Catherine Billups, Peter J Houghton.   

Abstract

Irofulven is a novel, small molecular weight semisynthetic compound, derived from a family of mushroom toxins known as illudins. This DNA alkylating agent has a chemical structure unlike any other chemotherapeutic agent in clinical use. The molecule is currently being studied in several Phase I, II, and III trials. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the antitumor activity of Irofulven in a panel of 20 pediatric solid tumor xenografts and to relate the Irofulven systemic exposure, defined as area under the concentration time curve, to the antitumor dose associated with tumor regression in the tumor models. Irofulven was administered i.v. daily for 5 days with courses repeated every 21 days for a total of three cycles. The minimum effective dose of Irofulven causing objective regression (> or =50% volume regression) of advanced tumors was determined for each of 19 of 20 independently derived tumor models (12 brain tumors, 4 neuroblastomas, and 4 rhabdomyosarcomas). At the maximum tolerated dose for three cycles of treatment (4.6 mg/kg/day) objective regressions were determined in 14 of 18 tumor lines (78%). However, the dose-response relationship was acute. At 2 mg/kg only 3 of 15 tumors tested demonstrated objective regressions, and in 3 additional tumors volume regressions were not achieved at a higher dose level (3 mg/kg), hence were not additionally tested. After administering the maximum tolerated dose (tolerated for one or two cycles of treatment) of Irofulven, 7 mg/kg, to mice bearing sensitive and resistant human tumors plasma concentration-time profiles were determined. Tumors were highly sensitive to Irofulven, but the systemic exposure required for a significant rate of objective response in this panel of tumors is in excess of that achievable in patients at tolerable doses, using this schedule of drug administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12231547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  6 in total

1.  National Cancer Institute pediatric preclinical testing program: model description for in vitro cytotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Min H Kang; Malcolm A Smith; Christopher L Morton; Nino Keshelava; Peter J Houghton; C Patrick Reynolds
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  Challenges and Opportunities for Childhood Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Raushan T Kurmasheva
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Initial testing of the hypoxia-activated prodrug PR-104 by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Christopher L Morton; Doris Phelps; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Stephen T Keir; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; Amy W Wozniak; Yongchuan Gu; William R Wilson; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 4.  Identifying novel therapeutic agents using xenograft models of pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Mouse models of medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Xiaochong Wu; Paul A Northcott; Sidney Croul; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2011-07

6.  Developing New Agents for Treatment of Childhood Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities for Preclinical Testing.

Authors:  Samson Ghilu; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.