Literature DB >> 12231284

Mechanical efficiency of cycling with a new developed pedal-crank.

Paola Zamparo1, Alberto Minetti, Pietro di Prampero.   

Abstract

The mechanical efficiency of cycling with a new pedal-crank prototype (PP) was investigated during an incremental test on a stationary cycloergometer. The efficiency values were compared with those obtained, in the same experimental conditions and with the same subjects, by using a standard pedal-crank system (SP). The main feature of this prototype is that its pedal-crank length changes as a function of the crank angle being maximal during the pushing phase and minimal during the recovery one. This variability was expected to lead to a decrease in the energy requirement of cycling since, for any given thrust, the torque exerted by the pushing leg is increased while the counter-torque exerted by the contra-lateral one is decreased. Whereas no significant differences were found between the two pedal-cranks at low exercise intensities (w*=50-200 W), at 250-300 W the oxygen uptake (V*O2, W) was found to be significantly lower and the efficiency (eta=w*/V*O2) about 2% larger (p<0.05, Wilcoxon test) in the case of PP. Even if the measured difference in efficiency was rather small, it can be calculated that an athlete riding a bicycle equipped with the patented pedal-crank could improve his 1h record by about 1 km.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12231284     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00071-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Effects of short-term training using SmartCranks on cycle work distribution and power output during cycling.

Authors:  Harald Böhm; Stefan Siebert; Mark Walsh
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Cycling performance and mechanical variables using a new prototype chainring.

Authors:  Lucien Belen; Mickaël Habrard; Jean Paul Micallef; Stéphane Perrey; Daniel Le Gallais
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Efficiency in cycling: a review.

Authors:  Gertjan Ettema; Håvard Wuttudal Lorås
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The rotor pedaling system improves anaerobic but not aerobic cycling performance in professional cyclists.

Authors:  Jose A Rodríguez-Marroyo; Juan García-López; Karim Chamari; Alfredo Córdova; Olivier Hue; Jose G Villa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Changing relative crank angle increases the metabolic cost of leg cycling.

Authors:  Asher H Straw; Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Physiological Responses during Cycling With Oval Chainrings (Q-Ring) and Circular Chainrings.

Authors:  Alfredo Cordova; Iban Latasa; Jesus Seco; Gerardo Villa; Javier Rodriguez-Falces
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Effects of a Non-Circular Chainring on Sprint Performance During a Cycle Ergometer Test.

Authors:  Frédérique Hintzy; Frédéric Grappe; Alain Belli
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  The Relationship between Power Generated by Thrust and Power to Overcome Drag in Elite Short Distance Swimmers.

Authors:  Giorgio Gatta; Matteo Cortesi; Paola Zamparo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.