Literature DB >> 12230349

Sex differences in cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction: the role of procedure appropriateness.

Saif S Rathore1, Yongfei Wang, Martha J Radford, Diana L Ordin, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies have found that women are less likely than men to have cardiac catheterization after an acute myocardial infarction; however, it is unknown whether sex differences reflect inappropriate treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether cardiac catheterization use after acute myocardial infarction in men and women varied by sex and the appropriateness of the procedure, as determined by clinical guidelines.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of chart-abstracted data.
SETTING: U.S. acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS: 143 444 Medicare patients who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction between 1994 and 1996. MEASUREMENTS: Cardiac catheterization use within 60 days of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: Women had lower crude rates of cardiac catheterization than men (35.7% for women vs. 46.5% for men [ P < 0.001]; difference, 10.8 percentage points). Multivariable adjustment for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics reduced most of the sex differences in procedure use (risk-standardized rates, 40.3% for women vs. 41.9% for men [ P < 0.001]; difference, 1.6 percentage points). Sex differences in cardiac catheterization use varied by the appropriateness of the procedure. Risk-standardized rates of cardiac catheterization were similar for men and women with strong indications for the procedure (44.1% for women vs. 44.6% for men [ P > 0.2]; difference, 0.5 percentage point). Rates of cardiac catheterization use among patients with weak indications did not significantly differ between men and women (16.5% for women vs. 18.0% for men [ P = 0.096]; difference, 1.5 percentage points). Sex differences in cardiac catheterization use were largest for patients with equivocal indications (39.4% for women vs. 42.5% for men [ P < 0.001]; difference, 3.1 percentage points).
CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly persons, women have lower rates of cardiac catheterization use after an acute myocardial infarction than men. However, this difference was attenuated after multivariable adjustment, and it occurred primarily in patients with equivocal indications. We found no sex variations in procedure use among patients who had strong indications for cardiac catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12230349     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  23 in total

1.  Temporal trends in medical therapies for ST- and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: (from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [ARIC] Surveillance Study).

Authors:  Emily C O'Brien; Kathryn M Rose; Chirayath M Suchindran; Til Sturmer; Patricia P Chang; Alvaro Alonso; Christopher D Baggett; Wayne D Rosamond
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Age difference explains gender difference in cardiac intervention rates after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Randall R Fransoo; Patricia J Martens; Heather J Prior; Elaine Burland; Dan Château; Alan Katz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

3.  Sex differences in coronary catheterization and revascularization following acute myocardial infarction: time trends from 1994 to 2003 in British Columbia.

Authors:  Tara L Sedlak; Aihua Pu; Eve Aymong; Min Gao; Nadia Khan; Hude Quan; Karin H Humphries
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Referrals in acute coronary events for CARdiac catheterization: The RACE CAR trial.

Authors:  Catherine Kreatsoulas; Debi Sloane; Janice Pogue; James L Velianou; Sonia S Anand
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Does gender influence emergency department management and outcomes in geriatric abdominal pain?

Authors:  Rebekah L Gardner; Richard Almeida; Judith H Maselli; Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Gender differences in utilization of effective cardiovascular secondary prevention: a Cleveland clinic prevention database study.

Authors:  Leslie Cho; Byron Hoogwerf; Julie Huang; Danielle M Brennan; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Alan K Berger; Sue Duval; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and primary percutaneous coronary intervention choices in patients with similar coronary anatomy: A computer-based simulation examines the sex gap.

Authors:  B M Meyers; T Vira; Chi- Ming Chow; B L Abramson
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Neha Sekhri; Adam Timmis; Ruoling Chen; Cornelia Junghans; Niamh Walsh; M Justin Zaman; Justin Zaman; Sandra Eldridge; Harry Hemingway; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-24

10.  Sex, socioeconomic status, access to cardiac catheterization, and outcomes for acute coronary syndromes in the context of universal healthcare coverage.

Authors:  Gabriel E Fabreau; Alexander A Leung; Danielle A Southern; Merrill L Knudtson; J Michael McWilliams; John Z Ayanian; William A Ghali
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.