Literature DB >> 12230063

Laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis.

Carl Wood1, Raphael Kuhn, Jim Tsaltas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To consider and explain the possibility of difficulties in diagnosis of endometriosis at previous laparoscopy
DESIGN: Retrospective patient record review.
SETTING: The Endometriosis Care Centre of Australia and the private practices of authors. SAMPLE: Two hundred and fifteen patients with clinical evidence of endometriosis examined laparoscopically between March 1999 and May 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Confirmation of endometriosis by histological biopsy.
RESULTS: Endometriosis was confirmed in 168 of the 215 women. Of these women 38 had a previous negative laparoscopy within 12 months of the current laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible that in some of the patients, who previously had a negative laparoscopy, endometriosis was not recognised. Possible reasons for difficulty in diagnosis have been identified and techniques to improve diagnosis suggested. This retrospective study was performed to consider and explain the possibility of difficulties in diagnosis of endometriosis at previous laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12230063     DOI: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  2 in total

1.  Defining future directions for endometriosis research: workshop report from the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis In Montpellier, France.

Authors:  Peter A W Rogers; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Asgerally Fazleabas; Linda C Giudice; Grant W Montgomery; Felice Petraglia; Robert N Taylor
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 2.  The role of diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic abdominal conditions: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  W S Richardson; D Stefanidis; L Chang; D B Earle; R D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.