S Keiding1, H Vilstrup. 1. Dept. of Medicine V, PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. susanne@pet.auh.dk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is used to evaluate portal hypertension. METHODS: We measured HVPG in two separate liver veins in 169 liver vein catheterizations in 102 cirrhosis patients and in 27 patients with no liver disease (controls). RESULTS: In the controls, the two measurements differed by 0.0 +/- 1.8 mmHg (mean +/- s, n = 27), upper 95% confidence limit 3.6 mmHg (mean + 2 s). HVPG ranged from -0.1 to 8.3 mmHg, upper 95% confidence limit 6.7 mmHg. In cirrhosis, the two measurements agreed within +/- 3.6 mmHg in 39%. In 61%, the measurements differed by 4-34 mmHg. In 35%, fluoroscopy demonstrated hepatic vein-to-hepatic-vein shunting in veins with low HVPG values. In some patients with HVPG measurements above 30 mmHg, Doppler ultrasound examination showed arterialization of the hepatic vasculature. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate a hitherto unrecognized notable heterogeneity of the intrahepatic vasculature and HVPG measurements in cirrhosis. The presumption of interposition of non-flowing blood between the catheter tip and the portal system for the measurement of HVPG may thus be violated in about one-third of the cirrhosis cases because of abnormal outlet into hepatic venous shunts and in a minor fraction because of abnormal arterial inlet. In 26%, one measurement was below 12 mmHg, the other measurement above. If the HVPG had been measured in only one liver vein, 13% of the cases would have been classified in a lower risk group than appropriate according to the 12 mmHg concept of risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices.
BACKGROUND: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is used to evaluate portal hypertension. METHODS: We measured HVPG in two separate liver veins in 169 liver vein catheterizations in 102 cirrhosispatients and in 27 patients with no liver disease (controls). RESULTS: In the controls, the two measurements differed by 0.0 +/- 1.8 mmHg (mean +/- s, n = 27), upper 95% confidence limit 3.6 mmHg (mean + 2 s). HVPG ranged from -0.1 to 8.3 mmHg, upper 95% confidence limit 6.7 mmHg. In cirrhosis, the two measurements agreed within +/- 3.6 mmHg in 39%. In 61%, the measurements differed by 4-34 mmHg. In 35%, fluoroscopy demonstrated hepatic vein-to-hepatic-vein shunting in veins with low HVPG values. In some patients with HVPG measurements above 30 mmHg, Doppler ultrasound examination showed arterialization of the hepatic vasculature. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate a hitherto unrecognized notable heterogeneity of the intrahepatic vasculature and HVPG measurements in cirrhosis. The presumption of interposition of non-flowing blood between the catheter tip and the portal system for the measurement of HVPG may thus be violated in about one-third of the cirrhosis cases because of abnormal outlet into hepatic venous shunts and in a minor fraction because of abnormal arterial inlet. In 26%, one measurement was below 12 mmHg, the other measurement above. If the HVPG had been measured in only one liver vein, 13% of the cases would have been classified in a lower risk group than appropriate according to the 12 mmHg concept of risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices.
Authors: Didier Lebrec; Jaime Bosch; Rajiv Jalan; Francis J Dudley; Rada Jessic; Richard Moreau; Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan; Rajeshwar P Mookerjee; Eleonora Chiossi; Paul L M Van Giersbergen; Andjela Kusic-Pajic; Jasper Dingemanse Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Michael Winterdahl; Ole Lajord Munk; Michael Sørensen; Frank Viborg Mortensen; Susanne Keiding Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Tea L Laursen; Thomas D Sandahl; Konstantin Kazankov; Jacob George; Henning Grønbæk Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 5.742