Literature DB >> 12228759

Positron emission tomography in urologic oncology.

Oleg Shvarts1, Ken-ryu Han, Marc Seltzer, Allan J Pantuck, Arie S Belldegrun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is an emerging imaging modality that is being investigated for use in urologic oncology. PET scanning using the radioactive glucose analog FDG has proven to be a highly accurate imaging test for diagnosing and staging a variety of non-urologic cancer types. This review was performed to determine the role of PET imaging in genitourinary malignancies.
METHODS: A review of the literature focusing on PET and urologic oncology was performed. The role of PET imaging was reviewed in prostate, bladder, renal, and testicular cancer.
RESULTS: In testicular cancer, PET has a higher diagnostic accuracy than computed tomography (CT) for both staging and re-staging and should be the test of choice for the assessment of a CT-visualized residual mass following chemotherapy. In prostate, renal, and bladder cancer, the current role of PET is still being defined, but it has a high positive predictive value and can be used for problem solving in patients with indeterminate findings on conventional imaging. Its role in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer is hampered by the generally low glycolytic rate of most prostate tumors and their metastases. It has shown promise for staging and re-staging patients with advanced-stage disease and aggressive tumors suspected by a high tumor grade and high prostate-specific antigen velocity. PET has also demonstrated success when applied to renal cell carcinoma in classifying indeterminate renal masses as well as residual renal fossa masses following nephrectomy, gauging response to therapy, and staging and re-staging patients with a known diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: PET imaging has demonstrated great potential in certain applications, but further investigations are necessary to determine its eventual place as an imaging modality in genitourinary malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12228759     DOI: 10.1177/107327480200900408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Control        ISSN: 1073-2748            Impact factor:   3.302


  10 in total

Review 1.  [New techniques in computed tomography. Significance for urology].

Authors:  J Stattaus; M Forsting; M Goyen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The emergence of radioimmunoscintigraphy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Keane; Inger L Rosner; M Scott Wingo; David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate for lymph node staging in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seong-Jang Kim; Phillip J Koo; Kyoungjune Pak; In-Ju Kim; Keunyoung Kim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Molecular aspects of renal cell carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Hari Koul; Jung-Sik Huh; Kyle O Rove; Luiza Crompton; Sweaty Koul; Randall B Meacham; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Forced diuresis and dual-phase F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT scan for restaging of urinary bladder cancers.

Authors:  S Harkirat; Ss Anand; Mj Jacob
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-02

6.  Urologic skeletal metastases: current diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Stephanie H Alford; Paul S Chang; Ronald P Williams
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate-urea-lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shawn M Hillier; Kevin P Maresca; Frank J Femia; John C Marquis; Catherine A Foss; Nghi Nguyen; Craig N Zimmerman; John A Barrett; William C Eckelman; Martin G Pomper; John L Joyal; John W Babich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  PET imaging of VPAC1 expression in experimental and spontaneous prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kaijun Zhang; Mohan R Aruva; Nylla Shanthly; Christopher A Cardi; Satish Rattan; Chirag Patel; Christopher Kim; Peter A McCue; Eric Wickstrom; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  A dimerized urea-based inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen for 68Ga-PET imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martin Schäfer; Ulrike Bauder-Wüst; Karin Leotta; Frederic Zoller; Walter Mier; Uwe Haberkorn; Michael Eisenhut; Matthias Eder
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Is [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose FDG-PET/CT better than ct alone for the preoperative lymph node staging of muscle invasive bladder cancer?

Authors:  Mete Uttam; Nayak Pravin; Bhattacharya Anish; Kakkar Nandita; Mandal Arup
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.