Literature DB >> 12228442

Computer-Assisted Identification of Protoplasts Responsible for Rare Division Events Reveals Guard-Cell Totipotency.

R. D. Hall1, H. A. Verhoeven, F. A. Krens.   

Abstract

With the use of a computer-controlled microscope system to assist in the positioning and rapid relocation of large numbers of cultured cells, we were able to identify those protoplasts with the capacity to divide within a highly recalcitrant culture in which only a tiny fraction of the total population proceeds to produce viable microcalli. In the cultures used, comprising Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet) leaf protoplasts, it was confirmed that these cells can be recognized solely on the basis of morphological characters. Therefore, a direct link exists between competence for cell division in vitro and cell type. Divergent callus morphologies and totipotent potential could also be ascribed to distinct protoplast types and hence to cells with a specific origin. The progenitors of the totipotent protoplasts in these cultures have been confirmed as being stomatal guard cells. Consequently, in plants even the most highly adapted living cells clearly retain and can reactivate all of the functional genetic information necessary to recreate the whole organism; an extreme degree of cytodifferentiation is, therefore, no hindrance to expressing totipotent potential. In addition to the considerable practical value of these findings, their implications concerning our understanding of both the control of gene expression and plant cell differentiation and its reversibility are of fundamental significance.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 12228442      PMCID: PMC157273          DOI: 10.1104/pp.107.4.1379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  4 in total

Review 1.  How fixed is the differentiated state? Lessons from heterokaryons.

Authors:  H M Blau
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Signal transduction in guard cells.

Authors:  S M Assmann
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1993

Review 3.  Why are quiescent mesophyll protoplasts from Nicotiana sylvestris able to re-enter into the cell cycle and re-initiate a mitotic activity?

Authors:  A Durr; E Jamet; M C Criqui; P Genschik; Y Parmentier; J Marbach; B Plesse; M C Lett; T Vernet; J Fleck
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.079

4.  A truncated version of an ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase promoter from potato specifies guard cell-selective expression in transgenic plants.

Authors:  B Müller-Röber; U La Cognata; U Sonnewald; L Willmitzer
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.277

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.): shoot regeneration from callus and callus protoplasts.

Authors:  Alexander Dovzhenko; Hans-Ulrich Koop
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Stomatal Guard Cells Are Totipotent.

Authors:  R. D. Hall; T. Riksen-Bruinsma; G. Weyens; M. Lefebvre; J. M. Dunwell; F. A. Krens
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Temperature and Abscisic Acid Can Be Used to Regulate Survival, Growth, and Differentiation of Cultured Guard Cell Protoplasts of Tree Tobacco.

Authors:  C. Roberts; P. Sahgal; F. Merritt; B. Perlman; G. Tallman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 8.340

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.