Literature DB >> 12228089

Assessing third-year medical students' breast cancer screening skills.

Susan V Barrett1, Jane G Zapka, Kathleen M Mazor, Roger S Luckmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assesses the relationship between students' confidence and competency in breast screening practices, compares different measurement approaches to these competencies, and assesses the effect on clinical breast examination (CBE) performance of an additional training session with a standardized patient.
METHOD: In the spring of 1998, 96 third-year medical students (47 men and 49 women) at the University of Massachusetts Medical School completed knowledge items on breast cancer epidemiology and on perceived confidence in their counseling and CBE skills. The students were also rated on their performances of counseling and CBE skills.
RESULTS: Higher levels of confidence in mammography counseling skills and higher interview skills scores were associated with higher mammography counseling scores. Confidence levels in performing CBE, however, were not related to the actual performances of CBE. Students' knowledge of breast cancer was modestly related to their CBE scores. Finally, the students with one extra training session with a standardized patient performed significantly better on the CBE.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to directly measure students' breast cancer screening and physical examination skills because students' reported self-confidence for some skills might not accurately reflect their actual levels of performance. Additionally, while knowledge may be an important step to acquiring skills, knowledge may not be a good indicator of students' performances of risk assessment, counseling, or physical examination. Although confidence in counseling was related to counseling performance, the stability of this perception and how that translates into future cancer-control practices remain in question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12228089     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

Review 1.  Novel Approaches To Undergraduate Oncology Education.

Authors:  Francis J Ha; Sagun Parakh
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Improving safety for medical students and patients during medical electives-a novel simulation-based course.

Authors:  Robert M Maweni; Robert W Foley; Micol Lupi; Amy Woods; Shahram Shirazi; Vaughan Holm; Stella Vig
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Digital rectal examination skills: first training experiences, the motives and attitudes of standardized patients.

Authors:  Christoph Nikendei; Katja Diefenbacher; Nadja Köhl-Hackert; Heike Lauber; Julia Huber; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Wolfgang Herzog; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Jana Jünger; Markus Krautter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 4.  A review on considerations needed educating new physicians.

Authors:  A Alavi; N Amjadi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015

5.  Are simulated patients effective in facilitating development of clinical competence for healthcare students? A scoping review.

Authors:  Brett Williams; Jane Jee Yeon Song
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.