Literature DB >> 12226148

A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Lars Holmberg1, Anna Bill-Axelson, Fred Helgesen, Jaakko O Salo, Per Folmerz, Michael Häggman, Swen-Olof Andersson, Anders Spångberg, Christer Busch, Steg Nordling, Juni Palmgren, Hans-Olov Adami, Jan-Erik Johansson, Bo Johan Norlén.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy is widely used in the treatment of early prostate cancer. The possible survival benefit of this treatment, however, is unclear. We conducted a randomized trial to address this question.
METHODS: From October 1989 through February 1999, 695 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in International Union against Cancer clinical stage T1b, T1c, or T2 were randomly assigned to watchful waiting or radical prostatectomy. We achieved complete follow-up through the year 2000 with blinded evaluation of causes of death. The primary end point was death due to prostate cancer, and the secondary end points were overall mortality, metastasis-free survival, and local progression.
RESULTS: During a median of 6.2 years of follow-up, 62 men in the watchful-waiting group and 53 in the radical-prostatectomy group died (P=0.31). Death due to prostate cancer occurred in 31 of 348 of those assigned to watchful waiting (8.9 percent) and in 16 of 347 of those assigned to radical prostatectomy (4.6 percent) (relative hazard, 0.50; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.91; P=0.02). Death due to other causes occurred in 31 of 348 men in the watchful-waiting group (8.9 percent) and in 37 of 347 men in the radical-prostatectomy group (10.6 percent). The men assigned to surgery had a lower relative risk of distant metastases than the men assigned to watchful waiting (relative hazard, 0.63; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, radical prostatectomy significantly reduced disease-specific mortality, but there was no significant difference between surgery and watchful waiting in terms of overall survival. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226148     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  112 in total

1.  Priorities in future research in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Radical prostatectomy as treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A S Jewett; Neil Fleshner; Lawrence H Klotz; Robert K Nam; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Screening for aortic aneurysm. Human cost should not be dismissed.

Authors:  Simon Curtis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-01

Review 4.  [Indications for and results of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Graefen; P G Hammerer; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Correlation of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with pathologic stage.

Authors:  Stephen A Brassell; William R Krueger; Jong-Ho Choi; John A Taylor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Race/ethnicity and the receipt of watchful waiting for the initial management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Martin L Brown; Arnold L Potosky; Carrie N Klabunde; W W Davis; Judd W Moul; Angela Fahey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Oral selenium supplementation has no effect on prostate-specific antigen velocity in men undergoing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Suzanne Stratton; Amit M Algotar; James Ranger-Moore; Steven P Stratton; Elizabeth H Slate; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Patricia A Thompson; Larry C Clark; Frederick R Ahmann
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-07-20

Review 8.  [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schumacher; F C Burkhard; U E Studer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  In patients with early prostate cancer, is surgery better than watchful waiting?

Authors:  Shabbir M H Alibhai; Sven Gogov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  STAT3 inhibition in prostate and pancreatic cancer lines by STAT3 binding sequence oligonucleotides: differential activity between 5' and 3' ends.

Authors:  H Dan Lewis; Ashley Winter; Thomas F Murphy; Snehlata Tripathi; Virendra N Pandey; Beverly E Barton
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.