Literature DB >> 12225744

Evaluation of C-H cdots, three dots, centered O hydrogen bonds in native and misfolded proteins.

Aaron K Chamberlain1, James U Bowie.   

Abstract

Non-traditional C-H cdots, three dots, centered Y hydrogen bonds, in which a carbon atom acts as the hydrogen donor and an electronegative atom Y (Y=N, O or S) acts as the acceptor, have been reported in proteins, but their importance in protein structures is not well established. Here, we present the results of three computational tests that examine the significance of C-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bonds involving the C(alpha) in proteins. First, we compared the number of C(alpha)-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bonds in native structures with two sets of compact, energy-minimized decoy structures. The decoy structures contain about as many C(alpha)-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bonds as the native structures, indicating that the constraints of chain connectivity and compactness can lead to incidental formation of C(alpha)-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bonds. Secondly, we examined whether short C(alpha)-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bonds have a tendency to be linear, as is expected for a cohesive hydrogen-bonding interaction. The native structures do show this trend, but so does one of the decoy sets, suggesting that this criterion is also not sufficient to indicate a stabilizing interaction. Finally, we examined the preference for C(alpha)-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bond donors to be near to strong hydrogen bond acceptors. In the native proteins, the alpha protons attract strong acceptors like oxygen atoms more than weak acceptors. In contrast, hydrogen bond donors in the decoy structures do not distinguish between strong and weak acceptors. Thus, any individual C(alpha)-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bond may be fortuitous and occur due to the polypeptide connectivity and compactness. Taken collectively, however, C(alpha)-H cdots, three dots, centered Y bonds provide a weakly cohesive force that stabilizes proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12225744     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00785-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of side-chain rotamers in transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Aaron K Chamberlain; James U Bowie
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Perplexing cooperative folding and stability of a low-sequence complexity, polyproline 2 protein lacking a hydrophobic core.

Authors:  Zachary P Gates; Michael C Baxa; Wookyung Yu; Joshua A Riback; Hui Li; Benoît Roux; Stephen B H Kent; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  How physical forces drive the process of helical membrane protein folding.

Authors:  Karolina Corin; James U Bowie
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Association of a model transmembrane peptide containing gly in a heptad sequence motif.

Authors:  James D Lear; Amanda L Stouffer; Holly Gratkowski; Vikas Nanda; William F Degrado
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Harnessing solid-state packing for selective detection of chloride in a macrocyclic anionophore.

Authors:  Chris L Vonnegut; Airlia M Shonkwiler; Lev N Zakharov; Michael M Haley; Darren W Johnson
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Protein Mass Effects on Formate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Chethya Ranasinghe; Qi Guo; Paul J Sapienza; Andrew L Lee; Daniel M Quinn; Christopher M Cheatum; Amnon Kohen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 16.383

Review 7.  Linking protein motion to enzyme catalysis.

Authors:  Priyanka Singh; Thelma Abeysinghe; Amnon Kohen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Structural analysis of CsoS1A and the protein shell of the Halothiobacillus neapolitanus carboxysome.

Authors:  Yingssu Tsai; Michael R Sawaya; Gordon C Cannon; Fei Cai; Eric B Williams; Sabine Heinhorst; Cheryl A Kerfeld; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.