Literature DB >> 12225449

Pro re nata medication for psychoses: an audit of practice in two metropolitan hospitals.

Josh Geffen1, Lene Sorensen, Julie Stokes, Allison Cameron, Michael S Roberts, Laurence Geffen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of pro re nata (PRN) (as needed) medication in hospitalized patients with psychotic disorders.
METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted at two large public psychiatry units situated in inner city general hospitals. Pro re nata medication prescription, administration and outcomes were examined during inpatient episodes of care for 184 consecutive admissions of patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder. Patient demographics, diagnoses, and regularly prescribed medication were also recorded. All admissions were drawn from a three-month period from December 1998-February 1999.
RESULTS: The most prevalent diagnoses were schizophrenia related disorders (n = 111) and mania (n = 34). Substance use disorders (n = 49) were the most common comorbid dis-orders. Pro re nata medication was administered during the acute phase of 82% of admissions. Drugs prescribed Pro re nata were mostly typical antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and/or anti-cholinergics. Coprescription of typical antipsychotics PRN with regularly scheduled atypical antipsychotics was common (64%). Pro re nata medications accounted for 31% of the total antipsychotic dose and 28% of the total anxiolytic dose administered during acute treatment. Higher daily doses of PRN medication were given to manic patients, males, younger patients and those with substance use disorders. Pro re nata prescriptions usually specified a maximum daily dose (87%) but rarely gave indications for use (6%). Administration records frequently lacked a specified reason for use (48%) or a notation of outcome (64%). Unit staff noted medication-related morbidity in 37% of patients receiving PRN medication, compared to 3% of patients receiving only regularly scheduled medication. Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were most frequently associated with administration of PRN haloperidol (Relative Risk vs other PRN medications = 5.61, 95% CI = 2.36-13.73).
CONCLUSIONS: Pro re nata medications comprised a significant part of the treatment which psychotic patients received. The common practice of coprescribing PRN typical antipsychotics with scheduled atypical antipsychotics is potentially problematical since administration of PRN medication is associated with significant medication related morbidity. Preferential use of benzodiazepines as PRN agents may minimize this morbidity and foster subsequent compliance with regularly prescribed antipsychotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12225449     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01069.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0004-8674            Impact factor:   5.744


  4 in total

1.  Atypical antipsychotic usage among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.

Authors:  Junji Takeshita; Deborah Goebert; Iwalani Else; Barry Carlton; Courtenay Matsu; Anthony Guerrero
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-09

2.  Potential for drug interactions involving cytochromes P450 2D6 and 3A4 on general adult psychiatric and functional elderly psychiatric wards.

Authors:  S J C Davies; S Eayrs; P Pratt; M S Lennard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Does accreditation improve pro re nata benzodiazepines administration in psychiatric inpatients? Pre-post accreditation medical record comparison.

Authors:  Mohammed Abdullah Al-Sughayir
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2017-02-02

4.  The pharmacological management of acute behavioural disturbance: Data from a clinical audit conducted in UK mental health services.

Authors:  Carol Paton; Clive E Adams; Stephen Dye; Elizabeth Fagan; Chike Okocha; Thomas Re Barnes
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.