Literature DB >> 12225361

Insight into the potential for DNA idiotypic fusion vaccines designed for patients by analysing xenogeneic anti-idiotypic antibody responses.

Francesco Forconi1, Catherine A King, Surinder S Sahota, Christopher K Kennaway, Nigel H Russell, Freda K Stevenson.   

Abstract

DNA vaccines induce immune responses against encoded proteins, and have clear potential for cancer vaccines. For B-cell tumours, idiotypic (Id) immunoglobulin encoded by the variable region genes provides a target antigen. When assembled as single chain Fv (scFv), and fused to an immunoenhancing sequence from tetanus toxin (TT), DNA fusion vaccines induce anti-Id antibodies. In lymphoma models, these antibodies have a critical role in mediating protection. For application to patients with lymphoma, two questions arise: first, whether pre-existing antibody against TT affects induction of anti-scFv antibodies; second, whether individual human scFv fusion sequences are able to fold consistently to generate antibodies able to recognize private conformational Id determinants expressed by tumour cells. Using xenogeneic vaccination with scFv sequences from four patients, we have shown that pre-existing anti-TT immunity slows, but does not prevent, anti-Id antibody responses. To determine folding, we have monitored the ability of nine DNAscFv-FrC patients' vaccines to induce xenogeneic anti-Id antibodies. Antibodies were induced in all cases, and were strikingly specific for each patient's immunoglobulin with little cross-reactivity between patients, even when similar VH or VL genes were involved. Blocking experiments with human serum confirmed reactivity against private determinants in 26-97% of total antibody. Both immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and IgG2a subclasses were present at 1.3 : 1-15 : 1 consistent with a T helper 2-dominated response. Xenogeneic vaccination provides a simple route for testing individual patients' DNAscFv-FrC fusion vaccines, and offers a strategy for production of anti-Id antibodies. The findings underpin the approach of DNA idiotypic fusion vaccination for patients with B-cell tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12225361      PMCID: PMC1782777          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01452.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  36 in total

1.  In vivo priming by DNA injection occurs predominantly by antigen transfer.

Authors:  M Corr; A von Damm; D J Lee; H Tighe
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Manipulation of pathogen-derived genes to influence antigen presentation via DNA vaccines.

Authors:  J Rice; C A King; M B Spellerberg; N Fairweather; F K Stevenson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Bacterial CpG DNA activates immune cells to signal infectious danger.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.543

4.  Genetic fusion of chemokines to a self tumor antigen induces protective, T-cell dependent antitumor immunity.

Authors:  A Biragyn; K Tani; M C Grimm; S Weeks; L W Kwak
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  DNA vaccines against lymphoma: promotion of anti-idiotypic antibody responses induced by single chain Fv genes by fusion to tetanus toxin fragment C.

Authors:  M B Spellerberg; D Zhu; A Thompsett; C A King; T J Hamblin; F K Stevenson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  In vivo ablation of surface immunoglobulin on mature B cells by inducible gene targeting results in rapid cell death.

Authors:  K P Lam; R Kühn; K Rajewsky
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  DNA vaccines with single-chain Fv fused to fragment C of tetanus toxin induce protective immunity against lymphoma and myeloma.

Authors:  C A King; M B Spellerberg; D Zhu; J Rice; S S Sahota; A R Thompsett; T J Hamblin; J Radl; F K Stevenson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Carrier-induced, hapten-specific suppression: a problem of antigen presentation?

Authors:  X Renjifo; S Wolf; P P Pastoret; H Bazin; J Urbain; O Leo; M Moser
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Complete molecular remissions induced by patient-specific vaccination plus granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor against lymphoma.

Authors:  M Bendandi; C D Gocke; C B Kobrin; F A Benko; L A Sternas; R Pennington; T M Watson; C W Reynolds; B L Gause; P L Duffey; E S Jaffe; S P Creekmore; D L Longo; L W Kwak
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  V(H) gene sequences from primary central nervous system lymphomas indicate derivation from highly mutated germinal center B cells with ongoing mutational activity.

Authors:  A R Thompsett; D W Ellison; F K Stevenson; D Zhu
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  2 in total

1.  Control of human mesothelin-expressing tumors by DNA vaccines.

Authors:  C-L Chang; T-C Wu; C-F Hung
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 2.  DNA vaccines to attack cancer.

Authors:  Freda K Stevenson; Christian H Ottensmeier; Peter Johnson; Delin Zhu; Sarah L Buchan; Katy J McCann; Joanne S Roddick; Andrew T King; Feargal McNicholl; Natalia Savelyeva; Jason Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.