Literature DB >> 12222910

A comparison of the index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) with the peer assessment rating (PAR) and the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN).

N A Fox1, C Daniels, T Gilgrass.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate any relationship between ICON, IOTN and PAR. To establish whether or not ICON could replace these indices as a measure of orthodontic treatment complexity, outcome and need.
METHOD: The study models of 55 consecutively treated cases were examined and PAR, IOTN and ICON recorded.
RESULTS: The study showed significant correlations between IOTN and ICON with respect to need and PAR and ICON with respect to outcome.
CONCLUSION: It appears that ICON does reflect UK opinion and the current study provides some evidence that ICON may effectively replace PAR and IOTN as a means of determining need and outcome.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12222910     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  10 in total

1.  The perceptions of preclinical and clinical dental students to altered smile aesthetics.

Authors:  Maha Aljefri; Julie Williams
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2020-09-14

2.  Validity assessment and determination of the cutoff value for the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need among 12-13 year-olds in Southern Chinese.

Authors:  Zheng-Yu Liao; Fan Jian; Hu Long; Yun Lu; Yan Wang; Zhi Yang; Yu-Wei He; Peter Wamalwa; Jing Wang; Nian-Song Ye; Sheng Wang; Wen-Li Lai
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.344

3.  Orthodontic treatment needs in the western region of Saudi Arabia: a research report.

Authors:  Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics and desire for orthodontic treatment among Chinese undergraduate students.

Authors:  Song Yi; Chuqin Zhang; Chulei Ni; Ying Qian; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Psychosocial Impact of Malocclusion in 12-Year-Old Hong Kong Children.

Authors:  Derek Baram; Yanqi Yang; Chong Ren; Ziling Wang; Ricky Wing Kit Wong; Urban Hägg; Colman McGrath; Min Gu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2019-06-12

6.  Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Komil Tintodana; Sanjeev Verma; Satinder P Singh; Vinay Kumar; Raj K Verma; Nameksh R Bhupali
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2020-11-02

7.  Minimal Important Difference of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire Following Orthodontic Treatment: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan; Mohd Zambri Mohamed Makhbul; Zamros Yuzadi Mohd Yusof; Siti Adibah Othman
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03

8.  Orthodontic treatment of children/adolescents with special health care needs: an analysis of treatment length and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Moritz Blanck-Lubarsch; Ariane Hohoff; Dirk Wiechmann; Thomas Stamm
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Correlation between the DAI and ICON Indices used for Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment need in Croatian Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Renata Vidaković; Stjepan Špalj; Mladen Šlaj; Martina Šlaj; Višnja Katić
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2018-10-01

10.  Digital Models as an Alternative to Plaster Casts in Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Chung-Yan Vanessa Leung; Yanqi Yang; Chongshan Liao; Urban Hägg; Ricky Wing Kit Wong; Colman McGrath; Min Gu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2018-06-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.