Literature DB >> 12220039

The detection and management of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

James B Connelly1, Gerry B Hill, Wayne J Millar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an important cause of death in Canada, and about 80% of the deaths are due to ruptured aneurysm.
METHOD: To determine the most cost-effective way of controlling AAA in terms of early detection and clinical management, a cohort analysis was undertaken beginning at age 50 years, using a multistate life-table model with parameters derived from published articles. The model was used to determine (a) the optimum size for elective surgery and (b) the optimum rate of detection of intact AAA. Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was used to measure outcome.
RESULTS: The most cost-effective diameter for repair of an intact AAA increases with age between the limits of 55 and 70 mm. The predominant size for repair is 60 mm. The most cost-effective rate at which latent AAA should be detected is 20% per year, corresponding to a screening interval of 5 years. Selective screening by sex or smoking status, or both, does not improve cost-effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care patients aged 50 years and over should be offered abdominal ultrasonography every 5 years. Those with AAA should be kept under surveillance and offered elective surgery when the aneurysm reaches 60 mm in diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12220039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Invest Med        ISSN: 0147-958X            Impact factor:   0.825


  9 in total

1.  Vascular ultrasound screening for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Joanne Thanos; Mayvis Rebeira; B William Shragge; David Urbach
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11

2.  Twenty years of cost-effectiveness analysis in medical imaging: are we improving?

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Frank J Rybicki; Dan Greenberg; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Cost-effective diagnostic cardiovascular imaging: when does it provide good value for the money?

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Frank J Rybicki; Dan Greenberg; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Jorge A Mendoza; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance of intermediate-sized AAA, and management of symptomatic AAA.

Authors:  Marc D Silverstein; Stephen R Pitts; Elliot L Chaikof; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

5.  Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-01-01

6.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men: a Canadian perspective using Monte Carlo-based estimates.

Authors:  Bernard Montreuil; James Brophy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Challenges in synthesising cost-effectiveness estimates.

Authors:  Gemma E Shields; Jamie Elvidge
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-09

8.  Analysis of cost effectiveness of screening Danish men aged 65 for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Lars Ehlers; Kim Overvad; Jan Sørensen; Søren Christensen; Merete Bech; Mette Kjølby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-24

9.  Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?

Authors:  Lars Ehlers; Jan Sørensen; Lotte Groth Jensen; Merete Bech; Mette Kjølby
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.