Literature DB >> 12218978

Semiquantitative dipyridamole myocardial stress perfusion imaging for cardiac risk assessment before noncardiac vascular surgery: a meta-analysis.

Edward Etchells1, Maureen Meade, George Tomlinson, Deborah Cook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Semiquantitative dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scintigraphy may provide better estimates of perioperative cardiac risk than nonquantitative scintigraphy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a metaanalysis of semiquantitive dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction and cardiac death in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery.
METHODS: The data sources used were MEDLINE (from 1975 to 1999), citation lists, and correspondence with study authors. We included studies that evaluated preoperative semiquantitative dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery. For each study, we calculated results on the basis of the proportion of myocardial segments with reversible perfusion defects. The complications of interest were cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. We calculated likelihood ratios (LRs) and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for individual studies and for the combined data. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified nine studies involving a total of 1179 patients with 82 cardiac complications (complication rate, 7.0%). Most studies were grade C in quality. Normal scans significantly reduced the likelihood of perioperative cardiac complications (LR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.88). Fixed defects reduced the likelihood of complications, but the effect was not statistically significant (LR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24 to 1.1). Reversibility in less than 20% of myocardial segments did not change the likelihood of perioperative cardiac complications (LR, 1.3, 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.9). LRs for increasing extents of reversibility were: 20% to 29% reversibility (LR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.6), 30% to 39% reversibility (LR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.1), 40% to 49% reversibility (LR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.2), and 50% or more reversibility (LR, 11; 95% CI, 5.8 to 20). The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.89). Heterogeneity was found among study results, but exclusion of heterogeneous studies did not significantly change the summary results.
CONCLUSION: Reversible defects in less than 20% of myocardial segments do not significantly alter the risk of perioperative cardiac complications. Greater extents of reversibility on dipyridamole myocardial stress perfusion imaging increase the risk of perioperative complications after noncardiac vascular surgery, but the quality and amount of data regarding greater extents of reversibility are limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12218978     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.126563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  14 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review of the magnitude of the problem, the pathophysiology of the events and methods to estimate and communicate risk.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Lee Goldman; Deborah J Cook; Ken Gilbert; Kate Leslie; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Preoperative cardiac testing before major vascular surgery.

Authors:  Sanne E Hoeks; Olaf Schouten; Maureen J van der Vlugt; Don Poldermans
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on noncardiac surgery: Cardiovascular assessment and management : Are the differences clinically relevant? The European perspective.

Authors:  Steen D Kristensen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  3rd Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Pai Ching Yu; Bruno Caramelli; André Coelho Marques; Daniela Calderaro; Luciana Savoy Fornari; Claudio Pinho; Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Carlos Jardim; Carolina L Z Vieira; Debora Y M Nakamura; Denise Iezzi; Dirk Schreen; Eduardo Leal Adam; Elbio Antonio D'Amico; Emerson Q de Lima; Emmanuel de Almeida Burdmann; Enrique Indalecio Pachón Mateo; Fabiana Goulart Marcondes Braga; Fabio S Machado; Flavio J de Paula; Gabriel Assis Lopes do Carmo; Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; Gustavo Faibischew Prado; Heno Ferreira Lopes; João R C Fernandes; José J G de Lima; Luciana Sacilotto; Luciano Ferreira Drager; Luciano Janussi Vacanti; Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde; Luis F L Prada; Luis Henrique Wolff Gowdak; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Maristela Camargo Monachini; Milena Frota Macatrão-Costa; Milena Ribeiro Paixão; Mucio Tavares de Oliveira; Patricia Cury; Paula R Villaça; Pedro Silvio Farsky; Rinaldo F Siciliano; Roberto Henrique Heinisch; Rogerio Souza; Sandra F M Gualandro; Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi; Wilson Mathias
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.000

5. 

Authors:  André Arpad Faludi; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Ana Paula Marte Chacra; Henrique Tria Bianco; Abrahão Afiune; Adriana Bertolami; Alexandre C Pereira; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Andrei C Sposito; Antonio Carlos Palandri Chagas; Antonio Casella; Antônio Felipe Simão; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar; Bruno Caramelli; Carlos Costa Magalhães; Carlos Eduardo Negrão; Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Carlos Scherr; Claudine Maria Alves Feio; Cristiane Kovacs; Daniel Branco de Araújo; Daniel Magnoni; Daniela Calderaro; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Edgard Pessoa de Mello; Elizabeth Regina Giunco Alexandre; Emília Inoue Sato; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Fabiana Hanna Rached; Fábio César Dos Santos; Fernando Henpin Yue Cesena; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Henrique Andrade Rodrigues da Fonseca; Hermes Toros Xavier; Isabela Cardoso Pimentel Mota; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Jaqueline Scholz Issa; Jayme Diament; João Bosco Pesquero; José Ernesto Dos Santos; José Rocha Faria; José Xavier de Melo; Juliana Tieko Kato; Kerginaldo Paulo Torres; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Márcio Hiroshi Miname; Marileia Scartezini; Neusa Assumpta Forti; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Raul Cavalcante Maranhão; Raul Dias Dos Santos; Renato Jorge Alves; Roberta Lara Cassani; Roberto Tadeu Barcellos Betti; Tales de Carvalho; Tânia Leme da Rocha Martinez; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Wilson Salgado
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  [Limitation of operability. What does the internist need to know?].

Authors:  M Reppel; J Weil
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Edward Danson; Peter Hansen; Sayan Sen; Justin Davies; Ian Meredith; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Management Strategies for Noncardiac Surgery Following a Coronary Artery Event.

Authors:  Thomas F Whayne; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is predictive of perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Yang; Jin Ho Choi; Young-Wook Ki; Dong Ik Kim; Duk-Kyung Kim; Jeong Rang Park; Jae K Oh; Seung-Hyuk Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Identifying which treated hypertensive patients without known coronary artery disease should be tested for the presence of myocardial ischemia by perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Yves Lacourcière; Christian Côté; Jean Lefebvre; Luc Poirier; Marcel Dumont
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.