OBJECTIVE: To measure hot flashes by sternal skin conductance in an urban Mexican population and to determine variables associated with hot flash reporting and measurement. DESIGN: From June 1999 to August 2000, 67 perimenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years participated in interviews, anthropometric measures, and a 2-h recording of sternal skin conductance. Changes in sweating were used to demonstrate the presence/absence of a hot flash. During the test, women were asked to report if they experienced a hot flash. RESULTS: During the study period, 10 women reported and demonstrated every hot flash, 24 women never reported or demonstrated a hot flash, 7 demonstrated hot flashes but did not report any of them, 7 reported hot flashes but did not demonstrate any of them, and 19 showed a mixture of responses. Women who demonstrated hot flashes by sternal skin conductance were measured in a warmer room, had more years of education, consumed more eggs as a child, recalled a heavier weight at age 18, and had a lower body mass index at interview compared with women who did not demonstrate hot flashes by sternal skin conductance. Women who subjectively reported hot flashes were measured in a warmer room, were more likely to be postmenopausal, reported more frequent consumption of coffee, and spent fewer months breast-feeding their last child compared with women who did not report the experience of hot flashes during the testing period. CONCLUSION: Room temperature explained part of the variation between women who did and did not demonstrate hot flashes via sternal skin conductance, between women who did and did not report the experience of hot flashes, and between women who did and did not demonstrate concordance in objective and subjective measures. In addition to room temperature, coffee intake, months spent breast-feeding the last child, and recalled weight at age 18 were important variables predicting hot flash experience.
OBJECTIVE: To measure hot flashes by sternal skin conductance in an urban Mexican population and to determine variables associated with hot flash reporting and measurement. DESIGN: From June 1999 to August 2000, 67 perimenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years participated in interviews, anthropometric measures, and a 2-h recording of sternal skin conductance. Changes in sweating were used to demonstrate the presence/absence of a hot flash. During the test, women were asked to report if they experienced a hot flash. RESULTS: During the study period, 10 women reported and demonstrated every hot flash, 24 women never reported or demonstrated a hot flash, 7 demonstrated hot flashes but did not report any of them, 7 reported hot flashes but did not demonstrate any of them, and 19 showed a mixture of responses. Women who demonstrated hot flashes by sternal skin conductance were measured in a warmer room, had more years of education, consumed more eggs as a child, recalled a heavier weight at age 18, and had a lower body mass index at interview compared with women who did not demonstrate hot flashes by sternal skin conductance. Women who subjectively reported hot flashes were measured in a warmer room, were more likely to be postmenopausal, reported more frequent consumption of coffee, and spent fewer months breast-feeding their last child compared with women who did not report the experience of hot flashes during the testing period. CONCLUSION: Room temperature explained part of the variation between women who did and did not demonstrate hot flashes via sternal skin conductance, between women who did and did not report the experience of hot flashes, and between women who did and did not demonstrate concordance in objective and subjective measures. In addition to room temperature, coffee intake, months spent breast-feeding the last child, and recalled weight at age 18 were important variables predicting hot flash experience.
Authors: K L Rand; J L Otte; D Flockhart; D Hayes; A M Storniolo; V Stearns; N L Henry; A Nguyen; S Lemler; J Hayden; S Jeter; J S Carpenter Journal: Climacteric Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 3.005
Authors: Daniel E Brown; Lynnette L Sievert; Lynn A Morrison; Nichole Rahberg; Angela Reza Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Nicole J Gervais; Luke Remage-Healey; Joseph R Starrett; Daniel J Pollak; Jessica A Mong; Agnès Lacreuse Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Pauline M Maki; Lauren L Drogos; Leah H Rubin; Suzanne Banuvar; Lee P Shulman; Stacie E Geller Journal: Menopause Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Susan Thompson; Aditya Bardia; Angelina Tan; Debra L Barton; Lisa Kottschade; Jeff A Sloan; Brad Christensen; DeAnne Smith; Charles L Loprinzi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Janet S Carpenter; Katherine M Newton; Barbara Sternfeld; Hadine Joffe; Susan D Reed; Kristine E Ensrud; Jennifer L Milata Journal: Menopause Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.310