Literature DB >> 12218526

Can the tomographic aspect characteristics of patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome predict improvement in oxygenation-related response to the prone position?

Laurent Papazian1, Marie-Héléne Paladini, Fabienne Bregeon, Xavier Thirion, Olivier Durieux, Marc Gainnier, Laetitia Huiart, Serge Agostini, Jean-Pierre Auffray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In some patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, the prone position is able to improve oxygenation, whereas in others it is not. It could be hypothesized that the more opacities that are present in dependent regions of the lung when the patient is in the supine position, the better the improvement in oxygenation is observed when the patients are turned prone. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to identify computed tomographic scan aspects that could accurately predict who will respond to the prone position.
METHODS: We included 46 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (31 responders and 15 nonresponders). Computed tomographic scan was performed in the 6-h period preceding prone position. Blood gas analyses were performed before and at the end of the first 6-h period of prone position.
RESULTS: Arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen increased from 117 +/- 42 (mean +/- SD) in the supine position to 200 +/- 76 mmHg in the prone position (P < 0.001). There were 31 responders and 15 nonresponders. There was a vertebral predominance of the opacities (P < 0.0001). However, there was no difference between responders and nonresponders. When only the amount of consolidated lung located under the heart was evaluated, there was more consolidated tissue under the heart relative to total lung area in nonresponders than in responders (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: There are no distinctive morphologic features in the pattern of lung disease measured by computed tomographic scanning performed with the patient in the supine position that can predict response to the prone position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12218526     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of oxygenation response to prone position ventilation in ARDS by lung ultrasonography.

Authors:  Claude Guerin; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A pathophysiology-based review.

Authors:  Vasilios Koulouras; Georgios Papathanakos; Athanasios Papathanasiou; Georgios Nakos
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-04

3.  Lung ultrasonography for assessment of oxygenation response to prone position ventilation in ARDS.

Authors:  Malik Haddam; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Sebastien Perbet; Alice Baldovini; Christophe Guervilly; Charlotte Arbelot; Alexandre Noel; Coralie Vigne; Emmanuelle Hammad; François Antonini; Samuel Lehingue; Eric Peytel; Qin Lu; Belaid Bouhemad; Jean-Louis Golmard; Olivier Langeron; Claude Martin; Laurent Muller; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Jean-Michel Constantin; Laurent Papazian; Marc Leone
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Relationship between gas exchange response to prone position and lung recruitability during acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Alessandro Protti; Davide Chiumello; Massimo Cressoni; Eleonora Carlesso; Cristina Mietto; Virna Berto; Marco Lazzerini; Michael Quintel; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Electrical impedance tomography to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  François Perier; Samuel Tuffet; Tommaso Maraffi; Glasiele Alcala; Marcus Victor; Anne-Fleur Haudebourg; Keyvan Razazi; Nicolas De Prost; Marcelo Amato; Guillaume Carteaux; Armand Mekontso Dessap
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Lung ultrasound in acute respiratory distress syndrome and beyond.

Authors:  Cameron Baston; T Eoin West
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  S2e guideline: positioning and early mobilisation in prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary disorders : Revision 2015: S2e guideline of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI).

Authors:  Th Bein; M Bischoff; U Brückner; K Gebhardt; D Henzler; C Hermes; K Lewandowski; M Max; M Nothacker; Th Staudinger; M Tryba; S Weber-Carstens; H Wrigge
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Prone positioning monitored by electrical impedance tomography in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome on veno-venous ECMO.

Authors:  Guillaume Franchineau; Nicolas Bréchot; Guillaume Hekimian; Guillaume Lebreton; Simon Bourcier; Pierre Demondion; Loïc Le Guennec; Ania Nieszkowska; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Alain Combes; Matthieu Schmidt
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 9.  Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom.

Authors:  Claude Guérin; Richard K Albert; Jeremy Beitler; Luciano Gattinoni; Samir Jaber; John J Marini; Laveena Munshi; Laurent Papazian; Antonio Pesenti; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jordi Mancebo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 41.787

10.  Individualized ventilatory management in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Hiroki Taenaka; Takeshi Yoshida; Haruka Hashimoto; Hirofumi Iwata; Yukiko Koyama; Akinori Uchiyama; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.