Full substitution of the discriminative cue of a 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) agonist with the combined administration of a 5-HT(1B/2C) and a 5-HT(1A) agonist.

The present study examined whether animals attend to the individual components of the cue produced by a drug that stimulates different 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor populations, using a drug discrimination task based on the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure. The training drug was indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate) (INDO) that has been described as a 5-HT(1A/2C/1B) agonist able to exert discriminative control in both operant and CTA procedures. The principal objective was to examine generalization with the combined administration of agonists for the different receptor sites that may mimic the mechanism of action of the training drug. Male Wistar rats, deprived of water, were trained to discriminate INDO from saline; during the drug trials, the administration of INDO preceded saccharin-LiCl pairings, while, during the saline trials, the administration of saline preceded the saccharin-saline pairings. In generalization tests, INDO, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT(1A) agonist), 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP, a 5-HT(1B) agonist), alpha-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(2C) agonist) or 2-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(3) agonist), were administered alone or in combination. The results showed that 8-OH-DPAT, TFMPP and alpha-methyl-5-HT produced dose-dependent generalization, up to 88% in the case of 8-OH-DPAT. The combined administration of the following pairs of drugs, 8-OH-DPAT+TFMPP or 8-OH-DPAT+ alpha-methyl-5-HT, at doses that produced only 15-55% generalization when administered alone, produced greater than 80% generalization to INDO. However, the single administration of 2-methyl-5-HT produced only saline-like responding and its combined administration with 8-OH-DPAT did not modify the generalization produced by the single administration of 8-OH-DPAT. These results suggest that animals attend to the individual components of the drug cue; in the case of INDO, which has three elements, each mediated by a different receptor subpopulation (5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(2C) ), the separate stimulation of at least two receptor subpopulations was 'interpreted' by the subject as the presence of the training drug.