Literature DB >> 12218480

Coding of diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications of total hip arthroplasty.

Simon C Mears1, Maneesh Bawa, Pat Pietryak, Lynne C Jones, Amar D Rajadhyaksha, David S Hungerford, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

International Classification of Diseases coding of patient charts is used by hospitals to allow for billing of patients. Coding information also is used for assessing physician effectiveness. The purpose of the current study was to examine hospital coding for patients having total hip arthroplasty. One hundred consecutive primary total hip replacements were done at one medical center by two orthopaedic surgeons. Patient charts were coded by hospital coders according to the Health Care Finance Administration guidelines. Subsequently, an orthopaedist-based team did a secondary review of these charts and the two sets of codes were compared. The diagnostic codes were similar between the two groups for 87% (174 of 200 codes) of the cases. Comorbidities generally were undercoded by the hospital coders who reported 2.9 comorbidities per patient, whereas the secondary review reported 3.7 comorbidities per patient. The hospital coders found a complication rate of 1.2 per patient, whereas the secondary review revealed a rate of 0.4 per patient. Based on the results of the current study, the authors conclude that it is important to ensure three issues regarding the standard of coding and quality control: (1) the qualifications of the coders; (2) an interaction between coders and healthcare professionals to check that coding is accurate and reproducible; and (3) communication among various health professionals (including the primary surgeon) and coders to determine what actually are appropriate diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12218480     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200209000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  The Impact of Hospital Volume on Racial Differences in Complications, Readmissions, and Emergency Department Visits Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Muyibat A Adelani; Matthew R Keller; Robert L Barrack; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Is administratively coded comorbidity and complication data in total joint arthroplasty valid?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Ravi K Bashyal; Shawn G Anthony; Vanessa Chiu; Brandon Shulman; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score relate to complications after total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christine C Johnson; Sonal Sodha; Juan Garzon-Muvdi; Steve A Petersen; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments.

Authors:  Kristian Bjorgul; Wendy M Novicoff; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11-13

5.  Patient report improves posthospital discharge event capture in total joint replacement: a novel approach to capturing all posthospital event data.

Authors:  Leslie Harrold; Scott Pascal; Courtland Lewis; Regis O'Keefe; Vincent Pellegrini; Jeroan Allison; David Ayers; Patricia Franklin
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-10-22

6.  Accuracy of Internet-Based Patient Self-Report of Postdischarge Health Care Utilization and Complications Following Orthopedic Procedures: Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Benjamin I Rosner; Marc Gottlieb; William N Anderson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Medical device surveillance with electronic health records.

Authors:  Alison Callahan; Jason A Fries; Christopher Ré; James I Huddleston; Nicholas J Giori; Scott Delp; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-09-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.