Literature DB >> 12217994

Survey of public information about ongoing clinical trials funded by industry: evaluation of completeness and accessibility.

Eric Manheimer1, Diana Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the completeness and accessibility of public information about US clinical trials of drugs in development.
DESIGN: Review of online registers of clinical trials. DATA SOURCES: Drugs in phase III trials were identified using three drug industry sources: PhRMA Survey, What's in the Pipeline, and the NDA Pipeline. Drug trials were then searched for on the following publicly accessible registers of clinical trials:, and registers associated with the 37 "Comprehensive Cancer Centers" designated by the National Cancer Institute. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Extent of availability of public information on phase III trials of drugs in development for treating either prostate or colon cancer.
RESULTS: Search of industry sources identified 12 drugs for prostate cancer and 20 for colon cancer undergoing phase III trials. The most comprehensive publicly available register, contained trial listings for only seven of the prostate cancer drugs and 10 of the colon cancer drugs. Trials of three prostate cancer and three colon cancer drugs were listed on only one register each. A substantial proportion of trials of prostate cancer drugs (3/12) and colon cancer drugs (8/20) were not associated with trial listings in any registers.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing trials registers are unlikely to be meeting user needs since many ongoing drug trials are not listed. There is a clear need for a comprehensive clinical trials register encompassing all ongoing trials, including industry sponsored trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12217994      PMCID: PMC124135          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7363.528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  9 in total

1.  Fair conduct and fair reporting of clinical trials.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Helping patients access high quality health information.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Charnock; B Gann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

3.  Time to register randomised trials. The case is now unanswerable.

Authors:  R Horton; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-02

4.  Better access to information about clinical trials.

Authors:  A T McCray
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL Register of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Kay Dickersin; Eric Manheimer; Susan Wieland; Karen A Robinson; Carol Lefebvre; Steve McDonald
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Being a modern pharmaceutical company: involves making information available on clinical trial programmes.

Authors:  R Sykes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

Review 7.  The Cochrane Collaboration: evaluation of health care and services using systematic reviews of the results of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  K Dickersin; E Manheimer
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Retrospective and prospective identification of unpublished controlled trials: lessons from a survey of obstetricians and pediatricians.

Authors:  J Hetherington; K Dickersin; I Chalmers; C L Meinert
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  R W Scherer; K Dickersin; P Langenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  A clinical trials register for Europe.

Authors:  Alison Tonks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

2.  Web services-based access to local clinical trial databases: a standards initiative of the Association of American Cancer Institutes.

Authors:  Douglas C Stahl; Richard M Evans; Lawrence B Afrin; Richard M DeTeresa; Dave Ko; Kevin Mitchell
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  [From the design of use study to the assessment of the benefit: with or without pharmaceutical industry?].

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2011-01-16

Review 4.  Benefits and risks of pharmacological smoking cessation therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Edwin J Wagena; Maurice P A Zeegers; Constant P van Schayck; Emiel F M Wouters
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review.

Authors:  Natalie McGauran; Beate Wieseler; Julia Kreis; Yvonne-Beatrice Schüler; Heike Kölsch; Thomas Kaiser
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Finding Canadian cancer clinical trials on the Internet: an exploratory evaluation of online resources.

Authors:  James E Till; Robert A Phillips; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Legislation for trial registration and data transparency.

Authors:  Zhao-Xiang Bian; Tai-Xiang Wu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  A centralised public information resource for randomised trials: a scoping study to explore desirability and feasibility.

Authors:  Anne L Langston; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Zoë Skea
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Systematic review protocol assessing the processes for linking clinical trial registries and their published results.

Authors:  Rabia Bashir; Adam G Dunn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Annual International Geographic Medicine Congress Meetings in Shiraz, Iran: Publication Rates during 1999-2006.

Authors:  Forouz Nader; Kazem Mousavizadeh; Pedram Ghafourifar
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.