Literature DB >> 12217676

Discectomy strategies for lumbar disc herniation: study design and implications for clinical research.

Stephen J Haines1, Neil Jordan, James R Boen, John A Nyman, Neil B Oldridge, Bruce R Lindgren.   

Abstract

Although previous studies have found automated percutaneous discectomy and epidural percutaneous discectomy to be less efficacious than conventional discectomy, these percutaneous procedures may be effective and cost-effective as a first surgical treatment for herniated lumbar disc. Percutaneous procedures for herniated lumbar disc continue to be performed throughout the world without definitive evidence of efficacy or effectiveness. The objective of this article is to report the design considerations and final design of a study with the following objectives: (1) to estimate the efficacy of automated percutaneous and conventional discectomy in treating single level herniated lumbar discs in comparable patient populations, and (2) to test the hypothesis that the use of percutaneous discectomy as the first surgical procedure in such patients would result in less cost and fewer complications than utilizing conventional discectomy as the first procedure. A multicenter randomized clinical trial was designed that followed published eligibility criteria closely, allowed flexibility in timing of surgery (while collecting natural history information on patients identified before electing surgery), incorporated adjustments for newly developed technology and accommodated the unusual demands of assessing a procedure acknowledged to have inferior medical outcomes when compared to conventional therapy but which offered potential advantages in cost and safety. The study was successfully designed and funded. In its implementation we experienced several obstacles that may affect the success of other clinical trials. Despite using established eligibility criteria, our patient enrollment was lower than expected. Academic health centers and traditional research settings are seeing fewer patients who would be eligible for discectomy; private clinical centers are treating eligible patients but lack the incentives to participate in clinical research. Automated percutaneous discectomy and epidural percutaneous discectomy are widely performed procedures and, despite the aforementioned obstacles, their efficacy and cost-effectiveness need to be scientifically evaluated if we are committed to delivering appropriate patient care. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12217676     DOI: 10.1054/jocn.2002.1128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  2 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques for sciatica due to herniated disc, a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Mark P Arts; Maurits W van Tulder; Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Raymond W Ostelo; Arianne P Verhagen; Bart W Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of a Type II Collagen Fragment on the Expression of Genes of the Extracellular Matrix in Cells of the Intervertebral Disc.

Authors:  F Mwale; H T Wang; D J Zukor; O L Huk; A Petit; J Antoniou
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-01-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.