Literature DB >> 12217228

Using posturography to detect unsteadiness in 13 patients with peripheral neuropathy: a pilot study.

V A Reid1, H Adbulhadi, K R Black, Casey Kerrigan, D Cros.   

Abstract

Our aims were to use posturography to see if sway pattern differed between patients with large-fiber peripheral neuropathy and normal control subjects and, if it did, to compare posturography with conventional electromyography (EMG) as screening tools for large-fiber peripheral neuropathy. Thirteen patients who came to our neurophysiology laboratory with a preliminary diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy (made by their referring physicians) were compared with 7 nonmatched control subjects. All subjects received a neurologic examination and underwent posturography and conventional EMG. Results of posturography and conventional EMG were compared. Posturography showed abnormal sway patterns only in patients who had EMG abnormalities consistent with large-fiber peripheral neuropathy. These sway patterns differed significantly from those of the control subjects. Posturography seems to be a useful and well-tolerated screening test for patients with a history suggestive of peripheral neuropathy, and results of posturography agree with those of conventional EMG. Moreover, posturography directly measures increased sway in these patients and may be used as a more direct screen for risk of falls in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12217228     DOI: 10.1162/153840902760213658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1526-8748


  5 in total

Review 1.  The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits.

Authors:  M Mancini; F B Horak
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.874

2.  Sharpening the tandem walking test for screening peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Brian T Peters; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Doris H Kung; Dennis R Mosier; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  A comparative study of reaction times between type II diabetics and non-diabetics.

Authors:  Samantha J Richerson; Charles J Robinson; Judy Shum
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Nonlinear analysis of sensory organization test for subjects with unilateral vestibular dysfunction.

Authors:  Jia-Rong Yeh; Li-Chi Hsu; Chen Lin; Fu-Ling Chang; Men-Tzung Lo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quiet standing: The Single Inverted Pendulum model is not so bad after all.

Authors:  Pietro Morasso; Amel Cherif; Jacopo Zenzeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.