Literature DB >> 12217128

Implementation of telemedicine: the problem of evaluation.

Robert Harrison1, Anne MacFarlane, Paul Wallace.   

Abstract

In the UK, few telemedicine applications have endured beyond the trial phase. It is commonly said that lack of evidence is responsible for the lack of implementation. This assumes that evidence will lead to implementation. Studies show that this is naive, especially in organizations like health-care systems, which are characterized by professional dominance. Furthermore, other research indicates that the nature of the changes experienced by clinicians in telemedicine experiments is sometimes limiting compared with conventional practice. This presents a dilemma for evaluation since it cannot reliably take place until a particular technique has become stable and accepted into the daily routine. A programme of selected case studies is recommended to develop knowledge of how telemedicine can become a taken-for-granted part of medical care.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12217128     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X020080S217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  3 in total

1.  Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation.

Authors:  Carl May; Robert Harrison; Tracy Finch; Anne MacFarlane; Frances Mair; Paul Wallace
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care.

Authors:  Carl May
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications.

Authors:  Aud Obstfelder; Kjersti H Engeseth; Rolf Wynn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 7.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.