Literature DB >> 12216347

A rapid interview protocol supporting patient-centered quality improvement: hearing the parent's voice in a pediatric cancer unit.

Elisa J Sobo1, Glenn Billman, Lillian Lim, J Wilken Murdock, Elvia Romero, Donna Donoghue, William Roberts, Paul S Kurtin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine's 2001 report on quality delimits six dimensions of optimal care: safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient centeredness, and equity. In fall 2001 parents of pediatric cancer patients were interviewed to determine how well they thought these dimensions were addressed with respect to medication administration. Immediate goals were to identify system weaknesses and devise strategies to prevent future errors. A higher-order goal was to develop and demonstrate a model protocol for rapid-cycle interview assessments.
METHODS: Hematology/oncology directors worked with a research expert to develop a semistructured interview protocol. After training, which included directed reading, oral instruction, and role-playing, a convenience sample of 20 English- and Spanish-speaking parents of inpatients was recruited. Parents were asked to characterize current medication administration practices and to describe problems that they had experienced or witnessed. Rapid content analysis techniques were used to identify issues of importance to the parents.
FINDINGS: Parents' medication concerns centered on their children's comfort. Parents called for communication improvements, standardization of all nursing procedures and techniques, and a guide or an outline providing a clear understanding of what to expect when and from whom. Viewing these concerns in relation to the Institute of Medicine's quality domains allowed the department to frame an improvement action plan aligned with organizational and national priorities. IMPLICATIONS: With good supervision and limited focused training, inexperienced staff can successfully administer semistructured qualitative interviews and help analyze findings for rapid cycle improvement purposes. The protocol can be adapted for use in organizations interested in rapid qualitative assessments of patient and parent preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12216347     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28055-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  3 in total

1.  Assessing fidelity of cognitive behavioral therapy in rural VA clinics: design of a randomized implementation effectiveness (hybrid type III) trial.

Authors:  Michael A Cucciare; Geoffrey M Curran; Michelle G Craske; Traci Abraham; Michael B McCarthur; Kathy Marchant-Miros; Jan A Lindsay; Michael R Kauth; Sara J Landes; Greer Sullivan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Development of a patient decision aid for the management of superficial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in adults with a limited life expectancy.

Authors:  Alexandra Junn; Neha R Shukla; Lily Morrison; Meghan Halley; Mary-Margaret Chren; Louise C Walter; Dominick L Frosch; Dan Matlock; Jeanette S Torres; Eleni Linos
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Randall C Gale; Justina Wu; Taryn Erhardt; Mark Bounthavong; Caitlin M Reardon; Laura J Damschroder; Amanda M Midboe
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.