Literature DB >> 12216037

Preoperative identification of a bone-cement allergy in a patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Kevin Kaplan1, Craig J Della Valle, Kathleen Haines, Joseph D Zuckerman.   

Abstract

Allergy to polymethyl methacrylate bone-cement or its components is unusual. Because of the potential for an inflammatory response in an allergic patient and the possibility of pain and loosening if a cemented implant is used, it is imperative to identify patients with this allergy to modify their treatment. We report the case of an otherwise healthy 60-year-old woman who needed a total knee arthroplasty and who had an allergy to methyl methacrylate bone-cement identified preoperatively. The appropriate evaluation for a patient who is suspected to have an allergy to bone-cement or its components is reviewed. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12216037     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.33571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  A case series of cementless revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with benzoyl peroxide allergy.

Authors:  Frank S Fröschen; Nadine Gravius; Jan-Frederic Lau; Thomas Martin Randau; Eva Kaup; Max J Friedrich; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Lisa Renner; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 3.  [Allergy towards bone cement].

Authors:  P Thomas; A Schuh; B Summer; F Mazoochian; M Thomsen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies: joint statement by the implant allergy working group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German association of orthopedics and orthopedic surgery), DKG (German contact dermatitis research group) and dgaki (German society for allergology and clinical immunology)].

Authors:  P Thomas; A Schuh; J Ring; M Thomsen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  A rare case of pseudotumor formation associated with methyl methacrylate hypersensitivity in a patient following cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shachar Kenan; Leonard Kahn; Noga Haramati; Samuel Kenan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  [Allergy to bone cement components].

Authors:  P Thomas; A Schuh; R Eben; M Thomsen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Anaphylactic shock during cement implantation of a total hip arthroplasty in a patient with underlying mastocytosis: case report of a rare intraoperative complication.

Authors:  Anita Ten Hagen; Pieter Doldersum; Tom van Raaij
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-11-05

8.  Factors Associated with Perioperative Serum Calcium Levels in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Yi Mao; Yong Zheng; Yang Li; Guodong Wang; Jianmin Sun; Xingang Cui
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-03-09

9.  [Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies. Joint statement by the Implant Allergy Working Group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German Association of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery), DKG (German Contact Dermatitis Research Group) and DGAKI (German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology)].

Authors:  P Thomas; A Schuh; J Ring; M Thomsen
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.198

10.  The role of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in complicated knee arthroplasty: relevance of gentamicin allergy and benefit from revision surgery - a case control follow-up study and algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Benjamin Thomas; Maria Benedikt; Ali Alamri; Florian Kapp; Rainer Bader; Burkhard Summer; Peter Thomas; Eva Oppel
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.