Literature DB >> 12215959

Muscular efficiency during arm cranking and wheelchair exercise: a comparison.

F Hintzy1, N Tordi, S Perrey.   

Abstract

The present study was performed to compare various individual muscular efficiency indices, i. e., gross (GE), net (NE), work (WE), and delta (DE), during arm cranking ergometer (ACE) and wheelchair ergometer (WERG) exercise at the same relative exercise intensities. Following a maximal test on both the ACE and WERG, 15 able-bodied subjects completed 4 submaximal bouts at 0, 40, 55 and 70 % of the mode-specific VO(2) peak. The peak power output and VO(2) values were significantly higher with ACE than WERG maximal exercise. As a consequence, the power output imposed during WERG submaximal bouts was significantly lower compared to ACE submaximal bouts. ACE exercise was found to elicit a significantly higher (p < 0.001) VO(2) (16 to 28 vs 14 to 23 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)), GE (9 to 11 vs 6 to 9 %) and NE (14 to 13 vs 10 to 11 %) compared to WERG exercise at power output from 40 to 70 % VO(2) peak, respectively. However, WE (17 to 15 vs 17 to 14 % at 40 to 55 % VO(2)peak) and DE (12 to 13 vs 12 to 12 % at Delta 40 - 55 % to Delta 55 - 70 % VO(2) peak) values were similar between ACE and WERG exercise. The lower GE and NE observed during WERG compared to ACE exercise could be explained by the biomechanical disadvantages of the hand-rim WERG pattern movement. These findings also supported that the different indices of efficiency influenced the interpretation of the comparison between ACE and WERG propulsion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215959     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  6 in total

1.  The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Dale Lovell; Darron Shields; Belinda Beck; Ross Cuneo; Chris McLellan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Influence of crank length and crank width on maximal hand cycling power and cadence.

Authors:  Christian Krämer; Lutz Hilker; Harald Böhm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The Functional Classification and Field Test Performance in Wheelchair Basketball Players.

Authors:  Susana María Gil; Javier Yanci; Montserrat Otero; Jurgi Olasagasti; Aduna Badiola; Iraia Bidaurrazaga-Letona; Aitor Iturricastillo; Cristina Granados
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Arm Crank and Wheelchair Ergometry Produce Similar Peak Oxygen Uptake but Different Work Economy Values in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Tom Tørhaug; Berit Brurok; Jan Hoff; Jan Helgerud; Gunnar Leivseth
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of Aerobic Performance Testing Protocols in Elite Male Wheelchair Basketball Players.

Authors:  Bartosz Molik; Andrzej Kosmol; Natalia Morgulec-Adamowicz; Judit Lencse-Mucha; Anna Mróz; Karol Gryko; Jolanta Marszałek
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Julia Kathrin Baumgart; Laura Gürtler; Gertjan Ettema; Øyvind Sandbakk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.