Literature DB >> 12215666

Screening of dioxin-like toxicity equivalents for various matrices with wildtype and recombinant rat hepatoma H4IIE cells.

Peter A Behnisch1, Kazunori Hosoe, Abraham Brouwer, Shin-Ichi Sakai.   

Abstract

Determination of dioxin-like compounds utilizing in vitro bioassays such as ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) or chemical-activated luciferase expression (DR-CALUX) is an important tool to evaluate their Ah receptor-mediated toxic effects. The aim of this study is to describe advantages and limitations of these bioassays using rat hepatoma (H4IIE) wildtype and recombinant H4IIE cells in a 96 well microtiter plate format. We are using these bioassays for the evaluation of relative responses (REP) from several congeners of dioxins (e.g., 2,3,4,7,8-PCDF) or dioxin-like compounds (PCB-126, 2,3,4,7,8-PBDF) to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. In addition, total toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) of mixtures of these dioxin-like compounds from several kinds of matrices such as feed, sediment, or thermal waste residues are measured by both bioassays and additional chemical analysis. These samples were measured in a cross-validation study between two laboratories using the DR-CALUX technology in comparison to the H4IIE-EROD assay and chemical analysis. Improvement of the quality criteria of the newly developed DR-CALUX bioassays in comparison to the EROD bioassay was demonstrated (higher coefficient of determination r(2); better repeatability of TCDD and samples), while induction factor, limit of detection, and limit of quantification have been similar. The tested samples showed positive responses in both bioassays using different kinetics (EROD: 72 h; DR-CALUX: 24 h). Ratio of measured toxicity equivalent (TEQ) values varied around mean values of 0.89 (comparing both DR-CALUX laboratories, ranging from 0.68-3.1), 2.0 (comparing EROD and DR-CALUX, ranging from 0.57-8.1), and 1.6-2.5 (comparing EROD-TEQ and I-TEQ, mean 1.6, ranging from 1.0-3.9; for DR-CALUX/I-TEQ, 2.5; 0.61-8.3), respectively. This demonstrates that these bioassays can be used as alternative screening technology for monitoring I-TEQ values in various standards and matrices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215666     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/69.1.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  12 in total

1.  In vitro tools for the toxicological evaluation of sediments and dredged materials: intra- and inter-laboratory comparisons of chemical and bioanalytical methods.

Authors:  Kathrin Eichbaum; Markus Brinkmann; Leonie Nuesser; Carolin Gembé; Marina Ohlig; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Markus Hecker; John P Giesy; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Persistent aryl hydrocarbon receptor inducers increase with altitude, and estrogen-like disrupters are low in soils of the Alps.

Authors:  Walkiria Levy; Bernhard Henkelmann; Silke Bernhöft; Toine Bovee; Franz Buegger; Gert Jakobi; Manfred Kirchner; Rodolfo Bassan; Norbert Kräuchi; Wolfgang Moche; Ivo Offenthaler; Primoz Simončič; Peter Weiss; Karl-Werner Schramm
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Formation of polybrominated dibenzofurans (PBDFs) after heating of a salmon sample spiked with decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209).

Authors:  Walter Vetter; Paul Bendig; Marina Blumenstein; Florian Hägele; Peter A Behnisch; Abraham Brouwer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Bioanalytical and instrumental screening of the uptake of sediment-borne, dioxin-like compounds in roach (Rutilus rutilus).

Authors:  Kathrin Eichbaum; Markus Brinkmann; Leonie Nuesser; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Garry Codling; Paul Jones; John P Giesy; Markus Hecker; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Characterization of dioxin-like contamination in soil and sediments from the "hot spot" area of petrochemical plant in Pancevo (Serbia).

Authors:  Sonja Kaisarevic; Klara Hilscherova; Roland Weber; Kristina L Sundqvist; Mats Tysklind; Ernest Voncina; Stanka Bobic; Nebojsa Andric; Kristina Pogrmic-Majkic; Mirjana Vojinovic-Miloradov; John Paul Giesy; Radmila Kovacevic
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Analysis of dioxins in contaminated soils with the calux and caflux bioassays, an immunoassay, and gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Malin Nording; Michael S Denison; David Baston; Ylva Persson; Erik Spinnel; Peter Haglund
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Characteristics and application of established luciferase hepatoma cell line that responds to dioxin-like chemicals.

Authors:  Zhi-Ren Zhang; Shun-Qing Xu; Xi Sun; Yong-Jun Xu; Xiao-Kun Cai; Zhi-Wei Liu; Xiang-Lin Tan; Yi-Kai Zhou; Jun-Yue Zhang; Hong Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Development of Species-Specific Ah Receptor-Responsive Third Generation CALUX Cell Lines with Enhanced Responsiveness and Improved Detection Limits.

Authors:  Jennifer C Brennan; Guochun He; Tomoaki Tsutsumi; Jing Zhao; Edward Wirth; Michael H Fulton; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Determination of the CYP1A-inducing potential of single substances, mixtures and extracts of samples in the micro-EROD assay with H4IIE cells.

Authors:  Andreas Schiwy; Markus Brinkmann; Ines Thiem; Gabriele Guder; Kerstin Winkens; Kathrin Eichbaum; Leonie Nüßer; Beat Thalmann; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Brigitte Thoms; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Cigarette Smoke Toxins-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Pancreatitis Involves Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mediated Cyp1 Gene Expression: Protective Effects of Resveratrol.

Authors:  Jyotirmoy Ghosh; Anindya Roy Chowdhury; Satish Srinivasan; Mrittika Chattopadhyay; Moumita Bose; Sabyasachi Bhattacharya; Haider Raza; Serge Y Fuchs; Anil K Rustgi; Frank J Gonzalez; Narayan G Avadhani
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.