Literature DB >> 12215565

Calculating the absorbed dose from radioactive patients: the line-source versus point-source model.

Jeffry A Siegel1, Carol S Marcus, Richard B Sparks.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In calculations of absorbed doses from radioactive patients, the activity distribution in such patients is generally assumed to be an unattenuated point source and the dose to exposed individuals at a given distance is therefore calculated using the inverse square law. In many nuclear medicine patients, the activity distribution is widely dispersed and does not simulate a point source. In these cases, a line-source model is proposed to more accurately reflect this extended activity distribution.
METHODS: Calculations of dose rate per unit activity were performed for a point source and for line sources of lengths of 20, 50, 70, 100, and 174 cm, and the ratios of line-source values to point-source values were calculated. In addition, radionuclide-independent conversion factors, to convert exposure rate constants to dose rates per unit activity, for these line-source lengths at various distances were determined.
RESULTS: The calculated values, substantiated by published data, indicate that the inverse square law approximation is not valid for a line source until a certain distance is reached, dependent on the length of the line source. For the 20-, 50-, 70-, 100-, and 174-cm line sources, the dose rate values estimated by the inverse square law approximation are within approximately 10% of the values estimated using the line-source approach at distances of 20, 45, 60, 85, and 145 cm, respectively. At closer distances, use of the point-source model for a patient with an extended activity distribution will overestimate the radiation absorbed dose to exposed individuals, sometimes by a very significant amount.
CONCLUSION: The line-source model is a more realistic and practical approach than the traditional point-source model for determining the dose to individuals exposed to radioactive patients with widespread activity distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  4 in total

1.  Physical dosimetry and mathematical dose calculation in nuclear medicine: A comparative study.

Authors:  Ali Shabestani Monfared; Mehrangiz Amiri
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01

2.  Radiation Exposure of the Hand and Chest during C-arm Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures.

Authors:  Cheol Hee Jung; Jae Sung Ryu; Seung Woo Baek; Ji Hye Oh; Nam Sik Woo; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-01-04

3.  Radiation safety issues in y-90 microsphere selective hepatic radioembolization therapy: possible radiation exposure from the patients.

Authors:  Young-Chul Kim; Yun-Hwan Kim; Soon-Ho Uhm; Yeon Seok Seo; Eun-Kyung Park; Sun-Young Oh; Eugene Jeong; Sinae Lee; Jae-Gol Choe
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-25

4.  The study of external dose rate and retained body activity of patients receiving 131I therapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Haiying Zhang; Ling Jiao; Songye Cui; Liang Wang; Jian Tan; Guizhi Zhang; Yajing He; Shuzhou Ruan; Saijun Fan; Wenyi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.