Literature DB >> 12214830

A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer.

Jatupol Srisomboon1, Chailert Phongnarisorn, Prapaporn Suprasert, Chalong Cheewakriangkrai, Sitthicha Siriaree, Kittipat Charoenkwan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization.
METHODS: Between July 1999 and May 2000, 100 patients with stage IA-IIA cervical cancer undergoing RHPL in Chiang Mai University Hospital were prospectively randomized to receive either no peritonization and no drainage (Group A = 48 cases) or retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization (Group B = 52 cases). Perioperative data and morbidity were recorded. Transabdominal and transvaginal sonography were performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively to detect lymphocyst formation.
RESULTS: Both groups were similar regarding age, size and gross appearance of tumor, tumor histology and stage. There was no difference between groups in respect of operative time, need for blood transfusion, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, number of nodes removed, nodal metastases, and need for adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Asymptomatic lymphocysts were sonographically detected at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively in 3 (6.8%), 2 (4.6%), and 3 (7.7%) of 44, 43, and 39 patients, respectively in Group A, whereas none was found in Group B (P = 0.2). No significant difference was found in term of postoperative morbidity in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Routine retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization after RHPL for invasive cervical cancer can be safely omitted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12214830     DOI: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00027.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  2 in total

Review 1.  Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Kittipat Charoenkwan; Chumnan Kietpeerakool
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-04

2.  Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma R Allanson; Aime Powell; Max Bulsara; Hong Lim Lee; Lynette Denny; Yee Leung; Paul Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.