Literature DB >> 12214768

Human factors error and patient monitoring.

T Walsh1, P C W Beatty.   

Abstract

A wide range of studies have shown that human factors errors are the major cause of critical incidents that threaten patient safety in the medical environments where patient monitoring takes place, contributing to approximately 87% of all such incidents. Studies have also shown that good cognitively ergonomic design of monitoring equipment for use in these environments should reduce the human factors errors associated with the information they provide. The purpose of this review is to consider the current state of knowledge concerning human factors engineering in its application to patient monitoring. It considers the prevalence of human factors error, principles of good human factors design, the effect of specific design features and the problem of the measurement of the effectiveness of designs in reducing human factors error. The conclusion of the review is that whilst the focus of human factors studies has, in recent years, moved from instrument design to organizational issues, patient monitor designers still have an important contribution to make to improving the safety of the monitored patient. Further, whilst better psychological understanding of the causes of human factors errors will in future guide better human factors engineering, in this area there are still many practical avenues of research that need exploring from the current base of understanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12214768     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/23/3/201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  8 in total

1.  A baseline study of medication error rates at Baylor University Medical Center in preparation for implementation of a computerized physician order entry system.

Authors:  Christina E Seeley; David Nicewander; Robert Page; Peter A Dysert
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2004-07

2.  Designing a tracking system based on cognitive theory of error.

Authors:  Hyung M Paek; Cynthia Brandt
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

3.  The role of expertise research and human factors in capturing, explaining, and producing superior performance.

Authors:  Neil Charness; Michael Tuffiash
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review.

Authors:  Ali Baba-Akbari Sari; Trevor A Sheldon; Alison Cracknell; Alastair Turnbull
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-15

5.  Anesthesia personnel's visual attention regarding patient monitoring in simulated non-critical and critical situations, an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Tadzio R Roche; Elise J C Maas; Sadiq Said; Julia Braun; Carl Machado; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Noethiger; David W Tscholl
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 6.  Augmenting Critical Care Patient Monitoring Using Wearable Technology: Review of Usability and Human Factors.

Authors:  Evismar Andrade; Leo Quinlan; Richard Harte; Dara Byrne; Enda Fallon; Martina Kelly; Siobhan Casey; Frank Kirrane; Paul O'Connor; Denis O'Hora; Michael Scully; John Laffey; Patrick Pladys; Alain Beuchée; Gearoid ÓLaighin
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-05-25

7.  A systematic review of the extent, nature and likely causes of preventable adverse events arising from hospital care.

Authors:  A Akbari Sari; L Doshmangir; T Sheldon
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.429

8.  Application of Cardio-Forecasting for Evaluation of Human-Operator Performance.

Authors:  Anton Panda; Volodymyr Nahornyi; Jan Valíček; Marta Harničárová; Iveta Pandová; Cristina Borzan; Samuel Cehelský; Lukáš Androvič; Hakan Tozan; Milena Kušnerová
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.