Literature DB >> 12214257

A randomised controlled trial of the effect of anticipation of a blood test on blood pressure.

T Marshall1, A Anantharachagan, K Choudhary, C Chue, I Kaur.   

Abstract

Blood pressure is affected by situational anxiety, such as the white coat effect. We hypothesised that blood pressure would also be affected by anticipation of a blood test. Volunteer subjects were recruited on the campus of Birmingham University. Subjects were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. After a period of rest, three seated blood pressure measurements were taken at 1-min intervals using an electronic sphygmomanometer. Between the second and third measurements subjects in the intervention group were told that a blood test would be carried out after the last measurement. No blood test was carried out. Three blood pressure measurements were made in all 213 randomised subjects. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. In the control group mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell in successive measurements. Between the second and third measurements mean systolic blood pressure fell by 1.4 mm Hg in the control group and rose by 2.6 mm Hg in the intervention group (difference 4.0 mm Hg, P < 0.0001). A rise in diastolic blood pressure between the second and third measurements did not reach statistical significance. It was concluded that anticipation of a blood test affects measured systolic blood pressure in volunteers. The practice of taking blood tests at the same time as measuring blood pressure may potentially bias estimations of blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12214257     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of different measures of blood pressure. Use sphygmomanometers more, not less.

Authors:  William T Hamilton; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

2.  Blood Pressure during Blood Collection and the Implication for Absolute Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Niamh Chapman; Dean S Picone; Rachel E Climie; Martin G Schultz; Mark R Nelson; James E Sharman
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-02

3.  The Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST): Physiological and Subjective Responses in Anticipation, and Post-stress.

Authors:  Alexandra L Shilton; Robin Laycock; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-19

4.  The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.

Authors:  Mohammed A Mohammed; Tom Marshall; Paramjit Gill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.