Literature DB >> 12213779

GAZE: a generic framework for the integration of gene-prediction data by dynamic programming.

Kevin L Howe1, Tom Chothia, Richard Durbin.   

Abstract

We describe a method (implemented in a program, GAZE) for assembling arbitrary evidence for individual gene components (features) into predictions of complete gene structures. Our system is generic in that both the features themselves, and the model of gene structure against which potential assemblies are validated and scored, are external to the system and supplied by the user. GAZE uses a dynamic programming algorithm to obtain the highest scoring gene structure according to the model and posterior probabilities that each input feature is part of a gene. A novel pruning strategy ensures that the algorithm has a run-time effectively linear in sequence length. To demonstrate the flexibility of our system in the incorporation of additional evidence into the gene prediction process, we show how it can be used to both represent nonstandard gene structures (in the form of trans-spliced genes in Caenorhabditis elegans), and make use of similarity information (in the form of Expressed Sequence Tag alignments), while requiring no change to the underlying software. GAZE is available at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/analysis/GAZE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12213779      PMCID: PMC186661          DOI: 10.1101/gr.149502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  18 in total

1.  An assessment of gene prediction accuracy in large DNA sequences.

Authors:  R Guigó; P Agarwal; J F Abril; M Burset; J W Fickett
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Computational inference of homologous gene structures in the human genome.

Authors:  R F Yeh; L P Lim; C B Burge
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Prediction of gene structure.

Authors:  R Guigó; S Knudsen; N Drake; T Smith
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Two methods for improving performance of an HMM and their application for gene finding.

Authors:  A Krogh
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol       Date:  1997

5.  Genome annotation assessment in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M G Reese; G Hartzell; N L Harris; U Ohler; J F Abril; S E Lewis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Using database matches with for HMMGene for automated gene detection in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Krogh
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Genie--gene finding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M G Reese; D Kulp; H Tammana; D Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Constructing gene models from accurately predicted exons: an application of dynamic programming.

Authors:  Y Xu; R J Mural; E C Uberbacher
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1994-12

9.  Identification of human gene structure using linear discriminant functions and dynamic programming.

Authors:  V V Solovyev; A A Salamov; C B Lawrence
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol       Date:  1995

10.  A trans-spliced leader sequence on actin mRNA in C. elegans.

Authors:  M Krause; D Hirsh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-06-19       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  36 in total

1.  Computational gene prediction using multiple sources of evidence.

Authors:  Jonathan E Allen; Mihaela Pertea; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  GeneWise and Genomewise.

Authors:  Ewan Birney; Michele Clamp; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  A beginner's guide to eukaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Mark Yandell; Daniel Ence
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Prediction of small, noncoding RNAs in bacteria using heterogeneous data.

Authors:  Brian Tjaden
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Conrad: gene prediction using conditional random fields.

Authors:  David DeCaprio; Jade P Vinson; Matthew D Pearson; Philip Montgomery; Matthew Doherty; James E Galagan
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Proteins immunologically related to MAP65-1 accumulate and localize differentially during bud development in Vitis vinifera L.

Authors:  Luigi Parrotta; Claudia Faleri; Mauro Cresti; Giampiero Cai
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.356

7.  The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants.

Authors:  Angélique D'Hont; France Denoeud; Jean-Marc Aury; Franc-Christophe Baurens; Françoise Carreel; Olivier Garsmeur; Benjamin Noel; Stéphanie Bocs; Gaëtan Droc; Mathieu Rouard; Corinne Da Silva; Kamel Jabbari; Céline Cardi; Julie Poulain; Marlène Souquet; Karine Labadie; Cyril Jourda; Juliette Lengellé; Marguerite Rodier-Goud; Adriana Alberti; Maria Bernard; Margot Correa; Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam; Michael R Mckain; Jim Leebens-Mack; Diane Burgess; Mike Freeling; Didier Mbéguié-A-Mbéguié; Matthieu Chabannes; Thomas Wicker; Olivier Panaud; Jose Barbosa; Eva Hribova; Pat Heslop-Harrison; Rémy Habas; Ronan Rivallan; Philippe Francois; Claire Poiron; Andrzej Kilian; Dheema Burthia; Christophe Jenny; Frédéric Bakry; Spencer Brown; Valentin Guignon; Gert Kema; Miguel Dita; Cees Waalwijk; Steeve Joseph; Anne Dievart; Olivier Jaillon; Julie Leclercq; Xavier Argout; Eric Lyons; Ana Almeida; Mouna Jeridi; Jaroslav Dolezel; Nicolas Roux; Ange-Marie Risterucci; Jean Weissenbach; Manuel Ruiz; Jean-Christophe Glaszmann; Francis Quétier; Nabila Yahiaoui; Patrick Wincker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Exploration of plant genomes in the FLAGdb++ environment.

Authors:  Sandra Dèrozier; Franck Samson; Jean-Philippe Tamby; Cécile Guichard; Véronique Brunaud; Philippe Grevet; Séverine Gagnot; Philippe Label; Jean-Charles Leplé; Alain Lecharny; Sébastien Aubourg
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.993

9.  Genome-wide analysis of MIKCC-type MADS box genes in grapevine.

Authors:  José Díaz-Riquelme; Diego Lijavetzky; José M Martínez-Zapater; María José Carmona
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Genomix: a method for combining gene-finders' predictions, which uses evolutionary conservation of sequence and intron-exon structure.

Authors:  Avril Coghlan; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.