Marcio Guelmann1, Ivar A Mjör. 1. Department of Pediatric, Dentistry University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. mguelmann@dental.ufl.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to obtain an overview of materials and techniques used by pediatric dentistry clinicians for posterior restorations in primary molars and to compare the results to what is being taught in dental schools. METHODS: A form with questions in different formats was mailed to all 180 members of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in Florida. The information requested included material selection for restorations in primary molars and the type of cavity preparation for amalgam and resin-based materials, and the bonding system in use. The response was anonymous, but information about gender and year of graduation for the clinicians was provided. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the clinicians responded to the survey. Resin-based materials were the most commonly selected for Class I and II restorations, while stainless steel crowns were the predominant material when 3 or more surfaces are involved. The slot-type of preparation was the most commonly used for tooth-colored restorations and the fifth generation ("one-bottle system") of bonding agents was the preferred adhesive system in use in primary molars. CONCLUSIONS: Different opinions were found between clinicians and educators in respect to material selection and contraindication criteria for the use of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to obtain an overview of materials and techniques used by pediatric dentistry clinicians for posterior restorations in primary molars and to compare the results to what is being taught in dental schools. METHODS: A form with questions in different formats was mailed to all 180 members of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in Florida. The information requested included material selection for restorations in primary molars and the type of cavity preparation for amalgam and resin-based materials, and the bonding system in use. The response was anonymous, but information about gender and year of graduation for the clinicians was provided. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the clinicians responded to the survey. Resin-based materials were the most commonly selected for Class I and II restorations, while stainless steel crowns were the predominant material when 3 or more surfaces are involved. The slot-type of preparation was the most commonly used for tooth-colored restorations and the fifth generation ("one-bottle system") of bonding agents was the preferred adhesive system in use in primary molars. CONCLUSIONS: Different opinions were found between clinicians and educators in respect to material selection and contraindication criteria for the use of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.