Literature DB >> 12212645

Temporary and longer term retention of acoustic information.

István Winkler1, Oleg Korzyukov, Valentina Gumenyuk, Nelson Cowan, Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen, d Risto J Ilmoniemi, Kimmo Alho, Risto Näätänen.   

Abstract

Though many studies suggest that fine acoustic details fade from memory after 15 s or even less, everyday experience tells us that the voice of a person or a musical instrument can be recognized long after it was last heard. We wished to determine whether tones leave a lasting memory trace using an experimental model of implicit recognition and testing whether exact pitch information can be retrieved even after 30 s. Event-related brain potentials demonstrated the survival of an accurate representation of tone pitch in the auditory cortex. This result provides a link between short-duration buffering and permanent storage of acoustic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12212645     DOI: 10.1017/s0048577201393186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  Development of auditory sensory memory from 2 to 6 years: an MMN study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Glass; Steffi Sachse; Waldemar von Suchodoletz
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  The role of temporal structure in the investigation of sensory memory, auditory scene analysis, and speech perception: a healthy-aging perspective.

Authors:  Johanna Maria Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; David Poeppel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Longer storage of auditory than of visual information in the rabbit brain: evidence from dorsal hippocampal electrophysiology.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Timo Ruusuvirta; Tapani Korhonen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Have We Forgotten Auditory Sensory Memory? Retention Intervals in Studies of Nonverbal Auditory Working Memory.

Authors:  Michael A Nees
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 6.  Making Sense of Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Kaitlin Fitzgerald; Juanita Todd
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Low-level neural auditory discrimination dysfunctions in specific language impairment-A review on mismatch negativity findings.

Authors:  Teija Kujala; Miika Leminen
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  Song Is More Memorable Than Speech Prosody: Discrete Pitches Aid Auditory Working Memory.

Authors:  Felix Haiduk; Cliodhna Quigley; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-10

9.  Effects of Visual Attentional Load on the Tactile Sensory Memory Indexed by Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Xin He; Jian Zhang; Zhilin Zhang; Ritsu Go; Jinglong Wu; Chunlin Li; Kai Gan; Duanduan Chen
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.081

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.