C R Nath1, S T Sylvester2, V Yasek1, E Gunel3. 1. The Department of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown (Drs Nath and Yasek) 2. The Department of Reading, California University of Pennsylvania, California, Pennsylvania (Dr Sylvester) 3. The Department of Statistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown (Dr Gunel)
Abstract
PURPOSE: This research was conducted to develop a valid, reliable, quick, and nonstigmatizing tool for assessing literacy in the healthcare setting. METHODS: The Literacy Assessment for Diabetes (LAD) instrument was developed as a word recognition test composed of 3 graded word lists in ascending difficulty. This literacy test, which was specific to diabetes, measured a patient's ability to pronounce terms that they would encounter during clinic visits and in reading menu and self-care instructions. The majority of the terms were on a 4th-grade reading level, with the remaining words ranging from the 6th-through 16th-grade levels. To assess reliability and validity, the LAD was compared with the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT3) and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) by administering all 3 tests to 203 participants in a test-retest study design. RESULTS: All 3 tests (LAD, REALM, and WRAT3) reliably detected true intrasubject variation in word recognition from test to retest. In addition, LAD measured word recognition ability similar to the REALM and WRAT3. CONCLUSIONS: The LAD is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring literacy in adults with diabetes. It can be administered in 3 minutes or less, and the raw score is scaled to a reading grade level.
PURPOSE: This research was conducted to develop a valid, reliable, quick, and nonstigmatizing tool for assessing literacy in the healthcare setting. METHODS: The Literacy Assessment for Diabetes (LAD) instrument was developed as a word recognition test composed of 3 graded word lists in ascending difficulty. This literacy test, which was specific to diabetes, measured a patient's ability to pronounce terms that they would encounter during clinic visits and in reading menu and self-care instructions. The majority of the terms were on a 4th-grade reading level, with the remaining words ranging from the 6th-through 16th-grade levels. To assess reliability and validity, the LAD was compared with the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT3) and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) by administering all 3 tests to 203 participants in a test-retest study design. RESULTS: All 3 tests (LAD, REALM, and WRAT3) reliably detected true intrasubject variation in word recognition from test to retest. In addition, LAD measured word recognition ability similar to the REALM and WRAT3. CONCLUSIONS: The LAD is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring literacy in adults with diabetes. It can be administered in 3 minutes or less, and the raw score is scaled to a reading grade level.
Authors: Tam H Nguyen; Hyunjeong Park; Hae-Ra Han; Kitty S Chan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jolie Haun; Miyong T Kim Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-07-29
Authors: H Shonna Yin; Lee M Sanders; Russell L Rothman; Alan L Mendelsohn; Benard P Dreyer; Richard O White; Joanne P Finkle; Stefania Prendes; Eliana M Perrin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Miyong T Kim; Hee-Jung Song; Hae-Ra Han; Youngshin Song; Soohyun Nam; Tam Hieu Nguyen; Ho-Chang Benjamin Lee; Kim B Kim Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2011-10-24
Authors: Stacy Cooper Bailey; Angela G Brega; Trisha M Crutchfield; Tom Elasy; Haley Herr; Kimberly Kaphingst; Andrew J Karter; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Chandra Y Osborn; Michael Pignone; Russell Rothman; Dean Schillinger Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Emil F Coccaro; Sophie Lazarus; Joshua Joseph; Kathline Wyne; Tina Drossos; Louis Phillipson; Mary de Groot Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 19.112