Literature DB >> 12211626

The effects of cold, rotation, and genotype on the production of ultrasonic calls in infant mice.

Martin E Hahn1, Norman Schanz.   

Abstract

There has been a revival of interest recently in the ultrasonic calls of infant rodents as investigators are using them to assess neurobehavioral development and animal models of anxiety. We compared the rates of ultrasonic calling of infant mice of two genotypes in two situations, cold and rotation. The subjects of study were 169 mouse pups from 29 litters and of two F1 genotypes, C57BL/10J x DBA/2J and C57BL/10J x SJL/J. Half of each litter was recorded in a cool situation for 20 seconds and the other half was recorded while rotating at 10 rpm for 20 seconds. All pups were recorded on days of age 2 to 8. Rotation elicited calling at about twice the rate as cool temperature on each day of age and on average across days; situation (cold or rotation) accounted for over 50% of the variation between litters. Genotype also altered call rate, and on some days situation and genotype interacted. In studies of neurobehavioral development and the effects of pharmacological agents on infant mice, it is particularly important to understand the roles of the stimuli and genotypes employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12211626     DOI: 10.1023/a:1019728813891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  14 in total

1.  eEF2 in the prefrontal cortex promotes excitatory synaptic transmission and social novelty behavior.

Authors:  Xuanyue Ma; Liuren Li; Ziming Li; Zhengyi Huang; Yaorong Yang; Peng Liu; Daji Guo; Yueyao Li; Tianying Wu; Ruixiang Luo; Junyu Xu; Wen-Cai Ye; Bin Jiang; Lei Shi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 9.071

2.  The structure of innate vocalizations in Foxp2-deficient mouse pups.

Authors:  S Gaub; M Groszer; S E Fisher; G Ehret
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  Altered ultrasonic vocalization and impaired learning and memory in Angelman syndrome mouse model with a large maternal deletion from Ube3a to Gabrb3.

Authors:  Yong-Hui Jiang; Yanzhen Pan; Li Zhu; Luis Landa; Jong Yoo; Corinne Spencer; Isabel Lorenzo; Murray Brilliant; Jeffrey Noebels; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse models for speech and socio-cognitive disorders: insights into the evolution of vocal communication.

Authors:  J Fischer; K Hammerschmidt
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Communication impairments in mice lacking Shank1: reduced levels of ultrasonic vocalizations and scent marking behavior.

Authors:  Markus Wöhr; Florence I Roullet; Albert Y Hung; Morgan Sheng; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Foxp2 mutations impair auditory-motor association learning.

Authors:  Simone Kurt; Simon E Fisher; Günter Ehret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The structure and usage of female and male mouse ultrasonic vocalizations reveal only minor differences.

Authors:  Kurt Hammerschmidt; Konstantin Radyushkin; Hannelore Ehrenreich; Julia Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discomfort-related changes of call rate and acoustic variables of ultrasonic vocalizations in adult yellow steppe lemmings Eolagurus luteus.

Authors:  Anna V Klenova; Ilya A Volodin; Olga G Ilchenko; Elena V Volodina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Automated classification of mouse pup isolation syllables: from cluster analysis to an Excel-based "mouse pup syllable classification calculator".

Authors:  Jasmine M S Grimsley; Marie A Gadziola; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Ultrasonic vocalizations induced by sex and amphetamine in M2, M4, M5 muscarinic and D2 dopamine receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  Haoran Wang; Shuyin Liang; Jeffrey Burgdorf; Jurgen Wess; John Yeomans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.