Literature DB >> 12211378

Influence of macronutrients and activated charcoal on intake of sagebrush by sheep and goats.

J J Villalba1, F D Provenza, R E Banner.   

Abstract

We determined if supplemental macronutrients or activated charcoal influenced intake of sagebrush, a shrub that contains terpenes. Sheep (lambs 3 mo age, 33 kg) and goats (kids 5 mo age, 28 kg) were fed supplements high in energy, high in protein, or offered a choice between the two supplements before and after receiving sagebrush for 4 h/d. The effect of activated charcoal, a compound that reduces bioavailability of toxins, was assessed by offering charcoal mixed with a carrier or the carrier alone while animals consumed sagebrush for 4 h/d. The effects of supplemental macronutirents were tested before and after charcoal supplementation. Activated charcoal did not increase intake of sagebrush by sheep or goats (P > 0.05), but supplemental macronutrients influenced intake of sagebrush by both species (P < 0.05). Intake of sage-brush was markedly higher for animals fed the high-protein supplement than for animals fed the high-energy supplement (P < 0.05). Lambs (before and after charcoal supplementation) and kids (after charcoal supplementation) offered a choice between the two supplements used sagebrush at levels comparable to animals supplemented with protein. They consumed more CP than animals fed the high-energy supplement and more ME than lambs fed the high-protein supplement (P < 0.05). Thus, providing a choice between supplements enhanced intake of sagebrush and enabled animals to achieve a more balanced intake of macronutrients. Preference for supplement and sagebrush also depended on an animal's immediate past history with a supplement. Sheep and goats previously fed the high-energy or the high-protein supplement preferred, respectively, the high-protein or the high-energy supplement when given a choice (P < 0.05). The changes in preference for supplement caused a decreased intake of sagebrush by groups that preferred the energy concentrate, and an increased intake of sagebrush by groups that preferred the protein concentrate. Thus, supplements of different energy and protein densities consistently altered intake of sagebrush by sheep and goats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12211378     DOI: 10.2527/2002.8082099x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Intraspecific Variation in Nutritional Composition Affects the Leaf Age Preferences of a Mammalian Herbivore.

Authors:  Karen J Marsh; Jessica Ward; Ian R Wallis; William J Foley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Foraging in chemically diverse environments: energy, protein, and alternative foods influence ingestion of plant secondary metabolites by lambs.

Authors:  Juan J Villalba; Frederick D Provenza
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Quantifying the response of free-ranging mammalian herbivores to the interplay between plant defense and nutrient concentrations.

Authors:  Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez; Daniel D Issa; Peter B Banks; Clare McArthur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Feeding behavior of lambs in relation to kinetics of 1,8-cineole dosed intravenously or into the rumen.

Authors:  Luthando E Dziba; Jeffery O Hall; Frederick D Provenza
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Seasonal regulation of condensed tannin consumption by free-ranging goats in a semi-arid savanna.

Authors:  Ntuthuko R Mkhize; Ignas M A Heitkӧnig; Peter F Scogings; Dawood Hattas; Luthando E Dziba; Herbert H T Prins; Willem F de Boer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Use of Unpalatable Forages by Ruminants: The Influence of Experience with the Biophysical and Social Environment.

Authors:  Roberto A Distel; Juan J Villalba
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The use of biochar in animal feeding.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Schmidt; Nikolas Hagemann; Kathleen Draper; Claudia Kammann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Biochar as a feed supplement for nutrient digestibility and growth performance of Catla catla fingerlings.

Authors:  Muhammad Adnan Khalid; Syed Makhdoom Hussain; Shahid Mahboob; K A Al-Ghanim; Mian N Riaz
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.052

9.  Relative availability of tannin- and terpene-containing foods affects food intake and preference by lambs.

Authors:  Travis E Mote; Juan J Villalba; Fredrick D Provenza
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.793

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.