Literature DB >> 12211371

Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers.

F M Mitlöhner1, M L Galyean, J J McGlone.   

Abstract

To determine whether shade influences performance, carcass traits, immunology, respiration rate, and behavior of cattle under conditions similar to those in commercial feedlots, we used 168 heifers in 12 soil-surfaced pens. Six pens were shaded with a galvanized steel-roofed shade (approximately 4 m high), allowing for 2.12 m2 of shade/heifer, and six pens served as the unshaded control. Heifers were fed a 90% concentrate diet during the 121-d trial that began in mid-June, performance variables (DMI, BW, ADG, gain:feed) were measured, and dietary concentrations of NEm and NEg calculated from performance data. A blood sample was collected to assess immune measures. Respiration rates and behaviors (feeding, drinking, walking, standing, lying, agonistic, and bulling) also were measured during the study. Carcass data (yield grade, kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, longissimus muscle area, hot carcass weight, quality grade, liver abscess rate, and incidence of dark-cutting beef) were collected at slaughter. Shaded heifers had higher (P < 0.05) DMI, ADG, and final BW than unshaded heifers. The gain:feed ratio and calculated dietary NEm and NEg concentrations did not differ (P > 0.26) between treatments. Most carcass traits did not differ between treatments, but more (P < 0.02) carcasses ofheifers in shaded pens graded USDA Choice than those in unshaded pens, which resulted primarily from the incidence of dark cutters being decreased (P < 0.04) by approximately half in carcasses from shaded compared with unshaded heifers. Respiration rate and percentage of circulating neutrophils were decreased (P < 0.01) for shaded compared with unshaded heifers. The treatment x time of day effect was significant (P < 0.05) for all behavioral measurements. Shaded heifers spent more time laying down (0800, 1200, and 1500, P < 0.05) and less time standing (1200 and 1500, P < 0.05) than unshaded heifers. Agonistic behavior was less (P < 0.05) for shaded than for unshaded heifers at 1900 and 2000, and bulling was less (P < 0.05) for-shaded than unshaded heifers at 2100. Results suggest that shade improved performance and altered behavior by feedlot heifers during the summertime in West Texas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12211371     DOI: 10.2527/2002.8082043x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  20 in total

1.  The effects of shade on performance, carcass classes and behaviour of heat-stressed feedlot cattle at the finisher phase.

Authors:  K L Blaine; Ignatius Verla Nsahlai
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effect of hot temperatures on the hematological parameters, health and performance of calves.

Authors:  Jan Broucek; Peter Kisac; Michael Uhrincat
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  The effect of body weight on some welfare indicators in feedlot cattle in a hot environment.

Authors:  Serdal Dikmen; Hakan Ustuner; Abdulkadir Orman
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  The effect of shearing in a hot environment on some welfare indicators in Awassi lambs.

Authors:  Serdal Dikmen; Abdulkadir Orman; Hakan Ustuner
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Hypertrophic muscle growth and metabolic efficiency were impaired by chronic heat stress, improved by zilpaterol supplementation, and not affected by ractopamine supplementation in feedlot lambs1.

Authors:  Taylor L Barnes; Caitlin N Cadaret; Kristin A Beede; Ty B Schmidt; Jessica L Petersen; Dustin T Yates
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Stress-related hormonal alterations, growth and pelleted starter intake in pre-weaning Holstein calves in response to thermal stress.

Authors:  E López; M Mellado; A M Martínez; F G Véliz; J E García; A de Santiago; E Carrillo
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 3.787

7.  Environmental factors affecting feed intake of steers in different housing systems in the summer.

Authors:  H Koknaroglu; Z Otles; T Mader; M P Hoffman
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 8.  Double Muscling in Cattle: Genes, Husbandry, Carcasses and Meat.

Authors:  Leo O Fiems
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Impact of Feed Delivery Pattern on Aerial Particulate Matter and Behavior of Feedlot Cattle.

Authors:  Frank M Mitloehner; Jeff W Dailey; Julie L Morrow; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Evaluation of the welfare of cattle housed in outdoor feedlot pens.

Authors:  Temple Grandin
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.