Literature DB >> 12211233

Peer review of statistics in medical research. Reporting power calculations is important.

Douglas G Altman, David Moher, Kenneth F Schulz.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12211233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Quality of the supportive and palliative oncology literature: a focused analysis on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  David Hui; Joseph Arthur; Shalini Dalal; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Rong Chu; Richard Whitlock; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess power and sample size. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy.

Authors:  Margherita Cadeddu; Forough Farrokhyar; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Anna Garnett; Charles H Goldsmith
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Why perform a priori sample size calculation?

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Deven Reddy; Rudolf W Poolman; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Sub-lingual immunotherapy: world allergy organization position paper 2009.

Authors:  G Walter Canonica; Jean Bousquet; Thomas Casale; Richard F Lockey; Carlos E Baena-Cagnani; Ruby Pawankar; Paul C Potter; Philippe J Bousquet; Linda S Cox; Stephen R Durham; Harold S Nelson; Giovanni Passalacqua; Dermot P Ryan; Jan L Brozek; Enrico Compalati; Ronald Dahl; Luis Delgado; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Richard G Gower; Dennis K Ledford; Nelson Rosario Filho; Erkka J Valovirta; Osman M Yusuf; Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 6.  Current sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternatives.

Authors:  Peter Bacchetti
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 7.  Fundamentals of clinical outcomes assessment for spinal disorders: study designs, methodologies, and analyses.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken; Anne Kathleen B Ganal-Antonio; Francis H Shen; Jens R Chapman; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-03-12

8.  Favourable serum calcification propensity with intraperitoneal as compared with subcutaneous insulin administration in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter R van Dijk; Femke Waanders; Andreas Pasch; Susan J J Logtenberg; Titia Vriesendorp; Klaas H Groenier; Jan-Luuk Hillebrands; Nanno Kleefstra; Rijk O B Gans; Harry van Goor; Henk J G Bilo
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 9.  Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review.

Authors:  Pierre Charles; Bruno Giraudeau; Agnes Dechartres; Gabriel Baron; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-05-12

10.  Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Karsten J Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.