Literature DB >> 12210622

Evaluating serial observations of precancerous lesions for further study as a trigger for early intervention.

Stuart G Baker1, Melvyn S Tockman.   

Abstract

Many long-term studies of the early detection of cancer involve serial observations of precancerous lesions and information as to whether or not the subject was diagnosed with cancer during the study period. Often the purpose of these studies is to decide whether or not the precancerous lesion should be studied in a future trial as a trigger for early intervention. A general approach to the analysis of cancer biomarkers is to estimate false and true positive rates to determine if they fall in the target region of those false and true positives that indicate promise for further study. The challenge with analysing serial data on precancerous lesions is estimating false and true positive rates when the number of observations varies among subjects. To solve this problem, we propose a Markov chain model in reverse time. The methodology is illustrated using serial observations of precancerous lesions found on sputum cytology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12210622     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  RE: Leveraging Biospecimen Resources for Discovery or Validation of Markers for Early Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Longitudinal multistage model for lung cancer incidence, mortality, and CT detected indolent and aggressive cancers.

Authors:  William D Hazelton; Gary Goodman; William N Rom; Melvyn Tockman; Mark Thornquist; Suresh Moolgavkar; Joel L Weissfeld; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  Markers for early detection of cancer: statistical guidelines for nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Statistical issues in randomized trials of cancer screening.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer; Philip C Prorok
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.